Zane Hannah, Brunton Amanda, Carney Patricia A, Haney Elizabeth, Bonura Erin M
Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jan;40(1):240-246. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08891-8. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy gaining traction in medical education. However, studies demonstrating successful incorporation into Graduate Medical Education (GME) curricula are limited.
To assess the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of Infectious Disease (ID) TBL sessions within an Internal Medicine (IM) residency curriculum as part of a traditional 60-minute conference.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of TBL implementation assessing acceptability and feasibility (Phase 1), and efficacy (Phase 2).
Phase 1 included 101 IM residents and eight TBL naïve faculty. Phase 2 included aggregate cohort IM In-Training Exam (ITE) data before (2008-2013) and after (2014-2019) TBL implementation.
Eight TBL sessions were delivered once or twice weekly during 60-minute noon conferences.
We assessed feasibility by measuring individual Readiness Assurance Test (iRAT) completion rates and inclusion of TBL elements in each session; acceptability through attendance, perceived effectiveness rating and attitudes about TBL; efficacy by comparing ITE data for the overall ID content and specific TBL associated learning objectives.
Seventy-five of 93 (80%) residents attended at least one session. All TBL elements were successfully incorporated each session. Of those surveyed, 86% rated the TBL sessions as facilitating their learning "very (4)" or "extremely (5)" well on a 5-point Likert scale (p<0.001). ITE mean percent correct scores of total ID content as well as TBL associated learning objective performance were both significantly higher for the post-TBL cohort among PGY-2 (76.2 vs 62.3; 76.2 vs 62.6) and PGY-3 (73 vs 64.5; 76.2 vs 64.5) IM residents (p<0.05; p<0.001 respectively).
Implementing a complete TBL pedagogy within the traditional noontime conference hour in GME is feasible, acceptable to residents and faculty, and associated with improved learning efficacy demonstrated through improved ITE scores.
基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种在医学教育中越来越受关注的主动学习策略。然而,证明其成功纳入毕业后医学教育(GME)课程的研究有限。
评估在传统60分钟内科住院医师培训课程中开展传染病(ID)TBL课程的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
我们对TBL实施情况进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,评估其可接受性和可行性(第一阶段)以及有效性(第二阶段)。
第一阶段包括101名内科住院医师和8名未接触过TBL的教员。第二阶段包括TBL实施前(2008 - 2013年)和实施后(2014 - 2019年)内科住院医师培训考试(ITE)的汇总队列数据。
在60分钟的午间会议期间,每周进行一次或两次,共开展八次TBL课程。
我们通过测量个人准备度保证测试(iRAT)完成率以及每次课程中TBL元素的纳入情况来评估可行性;通过出勤率、感知有效性评分和对TBL的态度来评估可接受性;通过比较ITE中关于整体ID内容和与TBL相关的特定学习目标的数据来评估有效性。
93名居民中有75名(80%)至少参加了一次课程。每次课程都成功纳入了所有TBL元素。在接受调查的人中,86%的人在5点李克特量表上对TBL课程促进他们学习的程度评价为“非常(4)”或“极其(5)”好(p<0.001)。在内科住院医师PGY - 2(76.2对62.3;76.2对62.6)和PGY - 3(73对64.5;76.2对64.5)中,TBL实施后队列的ITE中总ID内容的平均正确得分百分比以及与TBL相关的学习目标表现均显著更高(分别为p<0.05;p<0.001)。
在GME传统的午间会议时间内实施完整的TBL教学法是可行的,住院医师和教员都可以接受,并且通过提高ITE分数证明与学习效果的改善相关。