Suppr超能文献

小组讨论在教授特定药理学概念方面的有效性。

Effectiveness of Small Group Discussions for Teaching Specific Pharmacology Concepts.

作者信息

Arja Sireesha Bala, Ponnusamy Kumar, Kottathveetil Praveen, Ahmed Tarig Fadlallah Altahir, Fatteh Reshma, Arja Sateesh Babu

机构信息

Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao Netherlands Antilles.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 4;30(2):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00938-9. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Small group discussions are used in medical education to reinforce learning and to promote the application of knowledge. Small group discussions can involve a variety of tasks, such as critical thinking, self-directed learning, problem-solving, and brainstorming. The objective of this study is to find out if small group discussions can improve students' learning of specific pharmacology topics and students' performance on assessments. In the present study, small group discussions were utilized for six unique topics in the pharmacology course, and knowledge-based tests were administered before and after small group discussions to examine their efficacy. Statistically significant improvement in knowledge gains was observed for antimicrobials and neuropharmacology topics, but not for anticancer agents. Students' performance in topics that had group discussions was better on summative assessments compared with the overall performance on the summative assessment in the pharmacology (study group; summer 2018). Students' (study group; summer 2018) overall grade on the summative assessment of the pharmacology course was better than overall pharmacology grade on the summative assessment of students who had no group discussions (control group; winter 2018). Students' perceptions of the small group discussions were satisfactory, suggesting group discussions may be an enjoyable way to improve students' performance in some pharmacology topics.

摘要

小组讨论在医学教育中被用于强化学习并促进知识的应用。小组讨论可以涉及各种任务,如批判性思维、自主学习、问题解决和头脑风暴。本研究的目的是探究小组讨论是否能提高学生对特定药理学主题的学习以及学生在评估中的表现。在本研究中,小组讨论被用于药理学课程的六个独特主题,并且在小组讨论前后进行了基于知识的测试以检验其效果。观察到抗菌药物和神经药理学主题在知识获取方面有统计学上的显著提高,但抗癌药物主题没有。与药理学(研究组;2018年夏季)总结性评估的整体表现相比,进行了小组讨论的主题中,学生在总结性评估中的表现更好。药理学课程总结性评估中,学生(研究组;2018年夏季)的整体成绩优于未进行小组讨论的学生(对照组;2018年冬季)在药理学总结性评估中的整体成绩。学生对小组讨论的看法令人满意,这表明小组讨论可能是提高学生在某些药理学主题中表现的一种有趣方式。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Dental Education: A Guide for Novice Tutors.牙科教育:新手导师指南。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43227. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

6
Assessment of goals in problem-based learning.基于问题的学习目标评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Nov;32(8):e79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验