Dadafarin Sina, Petersen Kristina H
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Mar 24;31(3):1065-1071. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01275-1. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Near-peer teaching (NPT) is a peer-assisted learning method that has been adopted by medical schools as studies have reported benefits to both tutors and tutees. Published studies suggest students may benefit from NPT programs when preparing for the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam, but they did not use a randomized controlled trial methodology. To determine the impact of a year-long NPT preparation program for the Step 1 examination, we conducted a randomized-controlled trial among second-year medical students at New York Medical College during the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years. Students who enrolled in the study were invited to complete a post-exam survey, and Step 1 examination scores of intervention and control groups were compared, controlling for preexisting academic differences and demographic traits. While the majority of students reported NPT program participation was a valuable use of their time, we found no significant difference in Step 1 scores between intervention and control groups. Notably, students identifying as female, underrepresented in medicine (UIM) or socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) enrolled in higher proportions compared to the combined M2 student body of the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 academic years. Our results may highlight the limitations of NPT programs for board examination preparation and inform the future design of peer-assisted learning programs within medical schools.
近同伴教学(NPT)是一种同伴辅助学习方法,由于研究报告称其对辅导者和被辅导者均有益处,医学院校已采用该方法。已发表的研究表明,学生在准备美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试时可能会从NPT项目中受益,但这些研究未采用随机对照试验方法。为了确定为期一年的NPT备考项目对第一步考试的影响,我们在2017 - 2018学年和2018 - 2019学年期间,对纽约医学院的二年级医学生进行了一项随机对照试验。邀请参与研究的学生完成考试后调查,并比较干预组和对照组的第一步考试成绩,同时控制已有的学术差异和人口统计学特征。虽然大多数学生报告称参与NPT项目是对他们时间的有效利用,但我们发现干预组和对照组在第一步考试成绩上没有显著差异。值得注意的是,与2017 - 2018学年和2018 - 2019学年M2学生总体相比,自我认定为女性、医学领域代表性不足(UIM)或社会经济地位不利(SED)的学生参与比例更高。我们的研究结果可能突出了NPT项目在备考资格考试方面的局限性,并为医学院校未来同伴辅助学习项目的设计提供参考。