Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放疝修补术治疗儿童疝术后疼痛和镇痛需求的比较。

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Requirements Between Laparoscopic and Open Hernia Repair in Children.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, UK.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2021 Dec;45(12):3609-3615. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06295-x. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study analyses the impact of anaesthetic blockade and intraperitoneal local anaesthetic infiltration on paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

METHOD

A retrospective review of paediatric laparoscopic hernia repairs versus open repairs. Anaesthetic blockade, analgesic consumption and postoperative pain scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

155 children underwent laparoscopic repair, 150 underwent open repairs. Median age was 7.2 months (16 days-14 years) in the laparoscopic group, 6 months (17 days-13 years) in the open group. Anaesthetic blockade varied significantly; 62.7% of open cases had caudal blockade compared to 21.6% laparoscopic (p < 0.001). A subset of laparoscopic patients had peritoneal local anaesthetic infiltration. 10.1% of laparoscopic cases required recovery analgesia, compared to 1.3% of open cases (p = 0.001). Postoperative analgesic consumption was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. Peritoneal infiltration reduced analgesic consumption in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.038). Age < 2 was associated with use of caudal (p < 0.001), which reduced analgesic consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy was associated with increased use of recovery analgesia. Caudal reduced the need for rescue and postoperative analgesia. Intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic is associated with reduced postoperative analgesia in laparoscopy. In suitable patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, combination caudal and peritoneal infiltration may prove a useful adjunctive analgesic strategy.

摘要

背景

本研究分析了麻醉阻滞和腹腔内局部麻醉浸润对小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的影响。

方法

回顾性分析腹腔镜疝修补术与开放修补术的比较。比较两组之间的麻醉阻滞、镇痛药物消耗和术后疼痛评分。

结果

155 例患儿行腹腔镜修补术,150 例行开放修补术。腹腔镜组的中位年龄为 7.2 个月(16 天-14 岁),开放组为 6 个月(17 天-13 岁)。麻醉阻滞差异显著;开放组 62.7%的病例行骶管阻滞,而腹腔镜组仅 21.6%(p<0.001)。部分腹腔镜患儿行腹腔内局部麻醉浸润。腹腔镜组有 10.1%的患儿需要恢复性镇痛,而开放组仅 1.3%(p=0.001)。腹腔镜组术后镇痛药物消耗明显较高。腹腔镜组腹膜浸润可减少镇痛药物消耗(p=0.038)。年龄<2 岁与骶管阻滞的使用相关(p<0.001),并减少了镇痛药物的消耗。

结论

腹腔镜手术与恢复性镇痛的应用增加相关。骶管阻滞可减少术后镇痛的需要。腹腔镜术中腹腔内局部麻醉浸润与术后镇痛减少相关。在适合接受腹腔镜手术的患者中,联合骶管和腹膜浸润可能是一种有用的辅助镇痛策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e44/8572823/67011602b213/268_2021_6295_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验