Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Nov;75(11):341-350. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13298. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Pharmacotherapy is the primary treatment strategy in major depression. However, two-thirds of patients remain depressed after the initial antidepressant treatment. Augmented cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for pharmacotherapy-resistant depression in primary mental health care settings proved effective and cost-effective. Although we reported the clinical effectiveness of augmented CBT in secondary mental health care, its cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of augmented CBT adjunctive to treatment as usual (TAU) and TAU alone for pharmacotherapy-resistant depression at secondary mental health care settings.
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis at 64 weeks, alongside a randomized controlled trial involving 80 patients who sought depression treatment at a university hospital and psychiatric hospital (one each). The cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) that compared the difference in costs and quality-adjusted life years, and other clinical scales, between the groups.
The ICERs were JPY -15 278 322 and 2 026 865 for pharmacotherapy-resistant depression for all samples and those with moderate/severe symptoms at baseline, respectively. The acceptability curve demonstrates a 0.221 and 0.701 probability of the augmented CBT being cost-effective for all samples and moderate/severe depression, respectively, at the threshold of JPY 4.57 million (GBP 30 000). The sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of our results restricting for moderate/severe depression.
Augmented CBT for pharmacotherapy-resistant depression is not cost-effective for all samples including mild depression. In contrast, it appeared to be cost-effective for the patients currently manifesting moderate/severe symptoms under secondary mental health care.
药物治疗是治疗重度抑郁症的主要策略。然而,三分之二的患者在初始抗抑郁药物治疗后仍持续抑郁。在初级精神卫生保健环境中,增强认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗药物抵抗性抑郁症已被证明是有效且具有成本效益的。尽管我们已经报告了增强型 CBT 在二级精神卫生保健中的临床效果,但尚未评估其成本效益。因此,我们旨在比较增强型 CBT 作为附加治疗(TAU)与单独 TAU 在二级精神卫生保健中治疗药物抵抗性抑郁症的成本效益。
我们在 64 周时进行了成本效益分析,同时进行了一项随机对照试验,该试验涉及 80 名在大学医院和精神病院(各一家)寻求抑郁症治疗的患者。成本效益通过增量成本效益比(ICER)来评估,该比比较了两组之间的成本和质量调整生命年差异以及其他临床量表。
对于所有样本和基线时中度/重度症状的患者,ICER 分别为 JPY-15278322 和 2026865 用于治疗所有药物抵抗性抑郁症。接受性曲线表明,对于所有样本和中度/重度抑郁症,在 JPY 4570 万(GBP 30000)的阈值下,增强型 CBT 的成本效益概率分别为 0.221 和 0.701。敏感性分析支持了我们的结果,即在限制中度/重度抑郁症的情况下具有稳健性。
对于包括轻度抑郁症在内的所有样本,增强型 CBT 治疗药物抵抗性抑郁症并不具有成本效益。相比之下,对于目前在二级精神卫生保健中表现出中度/重度症状的患者,它似乎具有成本效益。