International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Biostatistics Research Group, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Int J Cancer. 2021 Dec 15;149(12):2020-2031. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33767. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
International comparison of liver cancer survival has been hampered due to varying standards and degrees for morphological verification and differences in coding practices. This article aims to compare liver cancer survival across the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership's (ICBP) jurisdictions whilst trying to ensure that the estimates are comparable through a range of sensitivity analyses. Liver cancer incidence data from 21 jurisdictions in 7 countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom) were obtained from population-based registries for 1995-2014. Cases were categorised based on histological classification, age-groups, basis of diagnosis and calendar period. Age-standardised incidence rate (ASR) per 100 000 and net survival at 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were estimated. Liver cancer incidence rates increased over time across all ICBP jurisdictions, particularly for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the largest relative increase in the United Kingdom, increasing from 1.3 to 4.4 per 100 000 person-years between 1995 and 2014. Australia had the highest age-standardised 1-year and 3-year net survival for all liver cancers combined (48.7% and 28.1%, respectively) in the most recent calendar period, which was still true for morphologically verified tumours when making restrictions to ensure consistent coding and classification. Survival from liver cancers is poor in all countries. The incidence of HCC is increasing alongside the proportion of nonmicroscopically verified cases over time. Survival estimates for all liver tumours combined should be interpreted in this context. Care is needed to ensure that international comparisons are performed on appropriately comparable patients, with careful consideration of coding practice variations.
国际肝癌存活率的比较受到形态学验证标准和程度的不同以及编码实践差异的阻碍。本文旨在通过一系列敏感性分析,比较国际癌症基准合作组织(ICBP)司法管辖区的肝癌存活率,同时努力确保通过比较来确保估计的可比性。从澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、爱尔兰、新西兰、挪威和英国的 7 个国家的 21 个司法管辖区的人群登记处获得了 1995-2014 年的肝癌发病率数据。病例根据组织学分类、年龄组、诊断依据和日历期进行分类。估计了每 10 万人的年龄标准化发病率(ASR)和诊断后 1 年和 3 年的净生存率。所有 ICBP 司法管辖区的肝癌发病率均随时间增加,特别是在英国,肝癌的相对增长率最大,1995 年至 2014 年间,每 10 万人年从 1.3 例增加到 4.4 例。在最近的日历期内,澳大利亚的所有肝癌的年龄标准化 1 年和 3 年净生存率最高(分别为 48.7%和 28.1%),对于形态学上验证的肿瘤也是如此,同时对一致性编码和分类做出限制。所有国家的肝癌生存率都很低。随着时间的推移,HCC 的发病率和非显微镜验证病例的比例都在增加。在这种情况下,应该解释所有肝癌肿瘤的综合生存率估计值。需要注意的是,在进行国际比较时,需要确保将适当可比的患者进行比较,并仔细考虑编码实践的差异。