Cancer Research UK Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):127-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
Cancer survival is a key measure of the effectiveness of health-care systems. Persistent regional and international differences in survival represent many avoidable deaths. Differences in survival have prompted or guided cancer control strategies. This is the first study in a programme to investigate international survival disparities, with the aim of informing health policy to raise standards and reduce inequalities in survival.
Data from population-based cancer registries in 12 jurisdictions in six countries were provided for 2·4 million adults diagnosed with primary colorectal, lung, breast (women), or ovarian cancer during 1995-2007, with follow-up to Dec 31, 2007. Data quality control and analyses were done centrally with a common protocol, overseen by external experts. We estimated 1-year and 5-year relative survival, constructing 252 complete life tables to control for background mortality by age, sex, and calendar year. We report age-specific and age-standardised relative survival at 1 and 5 years, and 5-year survival conditional on survival to the first anniversary of diagnosis. We also examined incidence and mortality trends during 1985-2005.
Relative survival improved during 1995-2007 for all four cancers in all jurisdictions. Survival was persistently higher in Australia, Canada, and Sweden, intermediate in Norway, and lower in Denmark, England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, particularly in the first year after diagnosis and for patients aged 65 years and older. International differences narrowed at all ages for breast cancer, from about 9% to 5% at 1 year and from about 14% to 8% at 5 years, but less or not at all for the other cancers. For colorectal cancer, the international range narrowed only for patients aged 65 years and older, by 2-6% at 1 year and by 2-3% at 5 years.
Up-to-date survival trends show increases but persistent differences between countries. Trends in cancer incidence and mortality are broadly consistent with these trends in survival. Data quality and changes in classification are not likely explanations. The patterns are consistent with later diagnosis or differences in treatment, particularly in Denmark and the UK, and in patients aged 65 years and older.
Department of Health, England; and Cancer Research UK.
癌症存活率是评估医疗体系有效性的关键指标。癌症存活率在国际和地区间存在持续差异,这意味着许多本可避免的死亡。存活率的差异推动或引导了癌症防控策略的制定。本研究是旨在为提高癌症存活率标准和减少存活率不平等提供卫生政策建议的方案中的第一项研究。
12 个司法管辖区的 6 个国家的人群癌症登记处提供了 1995-2007 年期间 240 万例原发性结直肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌(女性)或卵巢癌成年患者的数据,随访至 2007 年 12 月 31 日。数据质量控制和分析由外部专家监督的中央通用方案完成。我们通过 252 个完整寿命表来控制年龄、性别和日历年的背景死亡率,估计了 1 年和 5 年的相对存活率。我们报告了年龄特异性和年龄标准化的 1 年和 5 年相对存活率,以及在诊断后第一个周年时的 5 年存活率。我们还检查了 1985-2005 年期间的发病和死亡趋势。
在所有司法管辖区中,所有四种癌症的存活率在 1995-2007 年间均有所提高。澳大利亚、加拿大和瑞典的存活率一直较高,挪威的存活率居中,丹麦、英国、北爱尔兰和威尔士的存活率较低,尤其是在诊断后的第一年和 65 岁及以上的患者中。在所有年龄段,乳腺癌的国际差异均缩小,1 年时从约 9%缩小至 5%,5 年时从约 14%缩小至 8%,而其他癌症的差异缩小幅度较小或没有缩小。对于结直肠癌,65 岁及以上患者的国际差异仅缩小了 2-6%和 2-3%。
最新的存活率趋势显示,各国之间的存活率有所提高,但仍存在差异。癌症发病和死亡趋势与这些存活率趋势基本一致。数据质量和分类变化不太可能是解释。这些模式与丹麦和英国以及 65 岁及以上患者的较晚诊断或治疗差异一致。
英国卫生部和英国癌症研究中心。