• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 YouTube 上远端型尿道下裂修复视频的教育价值。

Assessment of the Educational Value of Distal Hypospadias Repair Videos on YouTube.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX.

出版信息

Urology. 2022 Jan;159:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.020
PMID:34461144
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of YouTube videos depicting distal hypospadias repair.

METHODS

The search terms "distal hypospadias repair" were used to identify surgical videos on YouTube. Videos were sorted by view count and the top 34 videos were reviewed for baseline video characteristics, key surgical steps covered, and conformity to a modified LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) checklist. All videos were reviewed and discussed for conformity by 2 attending pediatric urologists and a urology resident.

RESULTS

Of the 34 videos reviewed, 16 videos were excluded due to content. The median length of videos was 9.94 minutes (range, 2.57-99.12 minutes). Video quality was deemed of high quality in only 39% of videos. The most common type of hypospadias procedures described were tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (n = 13) and meatal advancement and glanuloplasty incorporated (n = 2). The median view count was 7828.5 (range, 1,133-58,619 views). Only 1 video met all modified LAP-VEGaS criteria (range of 33%-100%), and only 2 videos showed every surgical step of distal hypospadias repair (range 33%-100%). Modified LAP-VEGaS score, surgical step score, or quality of the video was not associated with a higher view count.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a common procedure, there is a paucity of high-quality videos on YouTube describing distal hypospadias repair techniques. It is unclear how learners select videos for study purposes and the most utilized videos on YouTube are not the most educational videos.

摘要

目的

评估描述远端尿道下裂修复的 YouTube 视频质量。

方法

使用“远端尿道下裂修复”搜索词在 YouTube 上搜索手术视频。根据观看次数对视频进行排序,然后查看前 34 个视频的基本视频特征、涵盖的关键手术步骤以及与改良腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)检查表的一致性。由 2 名主治儿科泌尿科医生和 1 名泌尿科住院医师对所有视频进行回顾和讨论,以评估其一致性。

结果

在审查的 34 个视频中,有 16 个由于内容被排除在外。视频的中位数长度为 9.94 分钟(范围为 2.57-99.12 分钟)。只有 39%的视频被认为质量较高。描述的最常见的尿道下裂手术类型是管状切开板尿道成形术(n=13)和尿道口前移及龟头成形术(n=2)。中位数观看次数为 7828.5(范围为 1133-58619 次)。只有 1 个视频符合所有改良 LAP-VEGaS 标准(范围为 33%-100%),只有 2 个视频显示了远端尿道下裂修复的所有手术步骤(范围为 33%-100%)。改良 LAP-VEGaS 评分、手术步骤评分或视频质量与较高的观看次数无关。

结论

尽管这是一种常见的手术,但 YouTube 上描述远端尿道下裂修复技术的高质量视频却很少。尚不清楚学习者如何选择用于学习的视频,而 YouTube 上使用最多的视频并非最具教育意义的视频。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Educational Value of Distal Hypospadias Repair Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上远端型尿道下裂修复视频的教育价值。
Urology. 2022 Jan;159:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
2
Educational Value of YouTube Surgical Videos of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Qualitative Assessment.YouTube 外科手术视频在小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术中的教育价值:定性评估。
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1129-1133. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0102. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Evaluation of YouTube laparoscopic hysterectomy videos as educational materials during the COVID-19 era using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) and LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool.评估 COVID-19 时代使用 LAParoscopic 手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)和 LAP-VEGaS 视频评估工具的 YouTube 腹腔镜子宫切除术视频作为教育材料。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1325-1330. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1962823. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Assessment of YouTube as an Educational Tool in Teaching Key Indicator Cases in Otolaryngology During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Neck Dissection.评估 YouTube 在 COVID-19 大流行期间及之后的耳鼻喉科关键指标病例教学中的教育工具价值:颈部解剖。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jan-Feb;78(1):214-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
Evaluation of the Educational Quality of the Top 30 Most Viewed Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上浏览量排名前 30 的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术视频的教育质量。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Apr;33(4):309-319. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0506. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
Evaluation of Online Videos of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using the LAP-VEGaS Guidelines.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在线视频评估:应用 LAP-VEGaS 指南。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04876-8. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
Hypospadias surgery on YouTube: is it valid?YouTube 上的尿道下裂手术:有效吗?
Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2021 Jun;73(3):236-242. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.19.05555-5. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
Assessing the Educational Value of YouTube Videos on Major Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Cross-sectional Study of the Top 20 Most Viewed Laparoscopic Right and Left Hepatectomy Videos.评估 YouTube 视频在大腹腔镜肝切除术中的教育价值:对前 20 个最受欢迎的腹腔镜右肝切除术和左肝切除术视频的横断面研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Dec 1;32(6):747-754. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001114.
9
Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees.YouTube 上外科手术视频的教育价值:资深外科医生与新手学员对腹腔镜阑尾切除术视频的质量评估。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 9;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0241-6. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparison of Educational and Academic Quality of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Videos on WebSurg and YouTube Platforms.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术视频在 WebSurg 和 YouTube 平台上的教育和学术质量比较。
Surg Innov. 2023 Dec;30(6):728-738. doi: 10.1177/15533506231208583. Epub 2023 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Can YouTube Be Considered a Reliable Learning Tool for Urology Trainees Seeking Information on Testicular Exploration?对于寻求睾丸探查信息的泌尿外科住院医师而言,YouTube能被视为一个可靠的学习工具吗?
Cureus. 2023 Oct 19;15(10):e47340. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47340. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Current perspectives in hypospadias research: A scoping review of articles published in 2021 (Review).尿道下裂研究的当前视角:对2021年发表文章的范围综述(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Mar 23;25(5):211. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11910. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?
免疫学领域的社交媒体内容:科学界是否需要进行评估?
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;11(2):473. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020473.