Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Surg Innov. 2023 Dec;30(6):728-738. doi: 10.1177/15533506231208583. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
The aim of this study was to compare the educational and academic quality of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) videos on YouTube and WebSurg platforms.
YouTube and WebSurg platforms were searched with the keyword "laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy". According to the exclusion criteria, 12 videos were found on WebSurg. To ensure a 1:1 ratio, the first 12 videos that met the criteria on YouTube were also analyzed. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used to evaluate the reliability of the videos. The non-educational quality of the videos was calculated using the Global Quality Score (GQS), the educational and academic quality of videos was calculated using Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy-specific score (LDP-SS) and Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines scoring system (LAP-VEGaS).
The mean JAMA score was 1.58 on YouTube and 2.83 on WebSurg ( < .001). The median GQS was 2 on YouTube and 5 on WebSurg ( < .001). The median LAP-VEGaS score was 8 on YouTube and 14.5 on WebSurg ( < .001). The median LDP-SS score was 6 on YouTube and 9.5 on WebSurg ( = .001). According to the LAP-VEGaS, eleven (91.7%) of the WebSurg videos had a high score of 11 or more ( = .04). According to Spearman correlation analysis, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between LDP-SS and JAMA, GQS and LAP-VEGaS (: .589, = .002; : .648, = .001; : .848, < .001 respectively).
The WebSurg is superior to the YouTube in terms of educational and academic value, quality, accuracy, reliability and usability in scientific meetings for LDP videos.
本研究旨在比较 YouTube 和 WebSurg 平台上腹腔镜胰体尾切除术（LDP）视频的教育和学术质量。
在 YouTube 和 WebSurg 平台上以“腹腔镜胰体尾切除术”为关键词进行搜索。根据排除标准，在 WebSurg 上找到了 12 个视频。为了保证 1:1 的比例，也分析了在 YouTube 上符合标准的前 12 个视频。使用美国医学协会杂志（JAMA）基准标准来评估视频的可靠性。使用全球质量评分（GQS）计算视频的非教育质量，使用腹腔镜胰体尾切除术特定评分（LDP-SS）和腹腔镜手术视频教育指南评分系统（LAP-VEGaS）计算视频的教育和学术质量。
YouTube 上的平均 JAMA 评分为 1.58，WebSurg 上为 2.83（<0.001）。YouTube 上的中位数 GQS 为 2，WebSurg 上为 5（<0.001）。YouTube 上的中位数 LAP-VEGaS 评分为 8，WebSurg 上为 14.5（<0.001）。YouTube 上的中位数 LDP-SS 评分为 6，WebSurg 上为 9.5（=0.001）。根据 LAP-VEGaS，WebSurg 上的 11 个（91.7%）视频得分在 11 分或以上（=0.04）。根据 Spearman 相关分析，LDP-SS 与 JAMA、GQS 和 LAP-VEGaS 之间存在统计学上显著的正相关（：0.589，=0.002；：0.648，=0.001；：0.848，<0.001）。
在 LDP 视频的科学会议中，WebSurg 在教育和学术价值、质量、准确性、可靠性和可用性方面优于 YouTube。
