Social Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany; Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;32:102800. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102800. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) entails severe impairments in interpersonal functioning that are likely driven by self-beneficial and exploitative behavior. Here, we investigate the underlying motivational and neural mechanisms of prosocial decision-making by experimentally manipulating motivational conflict between self-beneficial and prosocial incentives. One group of patients diagnosed with NPD and a group of healthy controls (CTL) were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a prosocial decision-making task. In this task, we systematically varied the level of conflict between self-beneficial and prosocial options on each trial. We analyzed choice behavior, response times, and neural activity in regions associated with conflict monitoring to test how motivational conflict drives prosocial choice behavior. Participants in the NPD group behaved less prosocially than the CTL group overall. Varying degrees of motivational conflict between self-beneficial and prosocial options induced response variability in both groups, but more so in the CTL group. The NPD group responded faster than the CTL group, unless choosing prosocially, which slowed response times to a level comparable to the CTL group. Additionally, neural activity tracking motivational conflict in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex was reduced in the NPD group. Collectively, low generosity in NPD appears to arise from reduced consideration of prosocial motives, which obviates motivational conflict with self-beneficial motives and entails reduced activity in neural conflict monitoring systems. Yet, our data also indicate that NPD is not marked by an absolute indifference to others' needs. This points to potentials for improving interpersonal relationships, effectively supporting the well-being of patients and their peers.
自恋型人格障碍(NPD)涉及严重的人际交往障碍,这可能是由自利和剥削行为驱动的。在这里,我们通过实验操纵自利和亲社会激励之间的动机冲突,研究亲社会决策的潜在动机和神经机制。一组被诊断为 NPD 的患者和一组健康对照组(CTL)在进行亲社会决策任务时接受了功能磁共振成像扫描。在这个任务中,我们在每次试验中系统地改变了自利和亲社会选项之间的冲突程度。我们分析了选择行为、反应时间和与冲突监测相关的区域的神经活动,以测试动机冲突如何驱动亲社会选择行为。总体而言,NPD 组的行为比 CTL 组不那么亲社会。自利和亲社会选项之间不同程度的动机冲突在两组中都引起了反应的可变性,但在 CTL 组中更为明显。NPD 组的反应速度比 CTL 组快,除非选择亲社会,这会将反应时间减慢到与 CTL 组相当的水平。此外,背内侧前额叶皮质中跟踪动机冲突的神经活动在 NPD 组中减少。总的来说,NPD 中的低慷慨似乎是由于对亲社会动机的考虑减少,这消除了与自利动机的动机冲突,并导致神经冲突监测系统的活动减少。然而,我们的数据也表明,NPD 并不是对他人需求的绝对漠不关心。这为改善人际关系提供了潜力,有效地支持了患者及其同伴的福祉。