Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100015, People's Republic of China.
Center of Liver Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):885. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06595-6.
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed an enormous threat to public health. The use of antiviral drugs in patients with this disease have triggered people's attentions. Whether interferon alfa-2b or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus interferon alfa-2b treatment can against SARS-CoV-2 was unknown. The objectives of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b and LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b for SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
This is a retrospective cohort study of 123 patients confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab and symptoms between Jan. 13 and Apr. 23, 2020. All patients received standard supportive care and regular clinical monitoring. Patients were assigned to standard care group (n = 12), interferon alfa-2b group (n = 44), and combination LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group (n = 67). The primary endpoints were duration of required oxygen support and virus clearance time. Associations between therapies and these outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression.
Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). No significant associations were observed between LPV/r/interferon alfa-2b and faster SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance (HR, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.61]; P = 0.61 in interferon alfa-2b group vs HR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.32-1.11]; P = 0.10 in LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group). Individual therapy groups also showed no significant association with duration of required oxygen support. There were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence of adverse events (P > 0.05).
In patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, no benefit was observed from interferon alfa-2b or LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b treatment. The findings may provide references for treatment guidelines of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发对公众健康构成了巨大威胁。抗病毒药物在患有这种疾病的患者中的使用引起了人们的关注。干扰素 alfa-2b 或洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)加干扰素 alfa-2b 是否能对抗 SARS-CoV-2 尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估干扰素 alfa-2b 和 LPV/r 加干扰素 alfa-2b 治疗成人 COVID-19 住院患者 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疗效和安全性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2020 年 1 月 13 日至 4 月 23 日期间通过鼻咽拭子 PCR 检测和症状确诊的 123 例 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。所有患者均接受标准支持性治疗和常规临床监测。患者被分为标准治疗组(n=12)、干扰素 alfa-2b 组(n=44)和 LPV/r 加干扰素 alfa-2b 组(n=67)。主要终点是需要吸氧支持的时间和病毒清除时间。采用 Cox 比例风险回归评估治疗与这些结局之间的关系。
三组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异(P>0.05)。LPV/r/干扰素 alfa-2b 与 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 清除加快之间无显著关联(干扰素 alfa-2b 组 HR:0.85[95%CI 0.45-1.61];P=0.61;LPV/r 加干扰素 alfa-2b 组 HR:0.59[95%CI 0.32-1.11];P=0.10)。各治疗组与需要吸氧支持的时间也无显著关联。三组患者不良反应发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。
在确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染的患者中,干扰素 alfa-2b 或 LPV/r 加干扰素 alfa-2b 治疗均未获益。研究结果可为 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的治疗指南提供参考。