From the Emergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):447-450. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002399.
To determine whether the use of dry-erase boards for communicating the plan of care of children evaluated in the pediatric emergency department (PED) improves the family experience of care.
Dry-erase boards were mounted at eye level in patient examination rooms. The study was conducted during a 4-week period during which physicians were instructed to use the boards on alternating weeks. During the 2 intervention weeks, they were instructed to write their name and plan of care in addition to their standard verbal communication. A questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of caregivers that measured their perceptions of physician listening skills, time spent with the physician, their understanding of the care plan, their willingness to ask questions, likelihood to recommend the PED, and overall physician care. Differences between intervention and nonintervention weeks were analyzed using adjusted multivariable modeling taking into account clustered observations within physician.
Surveys were completed by 672 caregivers. There were no significant differences in reported experience of care between the intervention and nonintervention weeks. During the intervention weeks, 59% of caregivers recalled use of the dry-erase boards, whereas 10% of caregivers recalled use during nonintervention weeks. Caregivers who recalled the use of dry-erase boards were more likely to report better physician listening skills, better understanding of the plan of care, and higher overall physician ratings.
Recommending use of dry-erase boards in pediatric emergency department rooms did not increase overall measures of experience of care, although patients who recalled dry-erase board use did report higher performance. Further study could explore how to effectively and efficiently use these boards.
确定在儿科急诊室(PED)评估的儿童护理计划使用干擦板是否能改善其家庭护理体验。
在患者检查室的视线高度安装干擦板。研究在四周内进行,医生在这四周内交替使用干擦板。在干预的两周内,除了进行标准的口头沟通外,他们还被要求在干擦板上写上自己的名字和护理计划。采用问卷调查了便利样本的照顾者,以衡量他们对医生倾听技巧、与医生相处的时间、对护理计划的理解、提问的意愿、对 PED 的推荐意愿以及对医生总体护理的评价。采用调整后的多变量模型分析干预和非干预周之间的差异,同时考虑到医生内部的聚类观察。
共完成了 672 位照顾者的调查。干预和非干预周之间的护理体验报告无显著差异。在干预周期间,59%的照顾者回忆起使用了干擦板,而非干预周期间有 10%的照顾者回忆起使用了干擦板。回忆使用干擦板的照顾者更有可能报告医生的倾听技巧更好、对护理计划的理解更好以及对医生的总体评价更高。
虽然回忆使用干擦板的患者报告的表现更好,但推荐在儿科急诊室使用干擦板并没有提高整体护理体验的衡量标准。进一步的研究可以探索如何有效地利用这些干擦板。