• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口腹腔镜结肠癌手术的长期肿瘤学结局

Long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

作者信息

Kim Chang Woo, Yang Seung Yoon, Hur Hyuk

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea.

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3200-3208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08629-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08629-1
PMID:34463871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies find similar perioperative outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colon cancer. However, few have reported long-term outcomes of SILS versus CLS. We aimed to compare long-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes as well as perioperative outcomes between SILS and CLS for colon cancer.

METHODS

A total of 641 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer from July 2009 to September 2014 were eligible for the study. Data from 300 of these patients were used for analysis after propensity score-matching (n = 150 per group). Variables associated with short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The SILS group had a shorter mean total incision length, less postoperative pain, and a similar mean rate of incisional hernia (2.7% versus 3.3%) compared with the CLS group. The 7-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 92.7% versus 94% (p = 0.673) and 85.3% versus 84.7% (p = 0.688) in the SILS and CLS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CLS, SILS for colon cancer appeared to be safe in terms of perioperative and long-term postoperative and oncologic outcomes. The results suggested that SILS is a reasonable treatment option for colon cancer for a selected group of patients.

摘要

背景

研究发现,单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)与传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)治疗结肠癌的围手术期结果相似。然而,很少有研究报告SILS与CLS的长期结果。我们旨在比较SILS与CLS治疗结肠癌的术后长期和肿瘤学结果以及围手术期结果。

方法

共有641例在2009年7月至2014年9月期间接受腹腔镜结肠癌手术的连续患者符合本研究条件。在进行倾向得分匹配后,使用其中300例患者的数据进行分析(每组n = 150)。分析与短期和长期结果相关的变量。

结果

与CLS组相比,SILS组的平均总切口长度更短,术后疼痛更少,切口疝的平均发生率相似(2.7%对3.3%)。SILS组和CLS组的7年总生存率和无病生存率分别为92.7%对94%(p = 0.673)和85.3%对84.7%(p = 0.688)。

结论

与CLS相比,SILS治疗结肠癌在围手术期、术后长期和肿瘤学结果方面似乎是安全的。结果表明,对于选定的一组患者,SILS是结肠癌的一种合理治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.单切口腹腔镜结肠癌手术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3200-3208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08629-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌的临床及肿瘤学效果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1117-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6370-2. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的肿瘤学结局比较(CSILS):一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照临床试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.
4
[A retrospective controlled clinical study of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer].单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠和上段直肠癌的回顾性对照临床研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 1;55(7):515-520. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.07.008.
5
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery.单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03058-x.
6
Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.系统评价比较单切口与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 4;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1721-6.
7
Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌的肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Sep;45:125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.103. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
[Application of single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery in radical right hemicolon cancer surgery].单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术在右半结肠癌根治术中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;24(1):54-61. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.441530-20200605-00344.
9
Cost analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜结肠癌手术的成本分析:倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Surg. 2020 Apr;43(4):557-563. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Right-Side Colon Cancer.单切口腹腔镜手术治疗右侧结肠癌的短期和长期疗效
Eur Surg Res. 2022;63(4):196-202. doi: 10.1159/000520677. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect.单切口腹腔镜结肠手术:系统评价、荟萃分析及未来展望
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Apr 25;8(2):48-60. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-078. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠乙状结肠癌的长期疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11500-2.
3
Comparative study of video recordings of non-medical devices in laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study.
腹腔镜手术中非医疗设备视频记录的比较研究:一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9533-9539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10441-y. Epub 2023 Sep 15.