• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的肿瘤学结局比较(CSILS):一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照临床试验研究方案。

Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijin Er Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.

Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 227, South Chongqing Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9
PMID:35799145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9264567/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In most previous studies, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) was feasible and safe in the short term. However, long-term oncologic outcomes remain uncertain, as only a few studies contained long-term survival data. SILS for CRC is still in the early stages of research. Further studies, particularly large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials, are necessary to assess the value of SILS for CRC.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, noninferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial that investigates the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for CRC. A total of 710 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the SILS group or the CLS group at a 1:1 ratio using a central, dynamic, and stratified block randomization method. Patients with ages ranging from 18 to 85 years old, of both sexes, with CRC above the peritoneal reflection diagnosed as cT1-4aN0-2M0 and a tumour size no larger than 5 cm will be considered for the study. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints include: intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain assessment, pathological outcomes, early morbidity and mortality rate, cosmetic effects, quality of life, 3-year overall survival (OS), incidence of incisional hernia, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS. The first two follow-up visits will be scheduled at one month and three months postoperatively, then every three months for the first two years and every six months for the next three years.

DISCUSSION

Currently, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been designed to investigate the long-term oncologic outcomes of SILS for CRC. This study is expected to provide clinical evidence of the oncologic outcomes of SILS compared to CLS for CRC to promote its widespread use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov:  NCT04527861 (registered on August 27, 2020).

摘要

背景

在大多数既往研究中,单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)治疗结直肠癌(CRC)在短期内是安全可行的。然而,长期肿瘤学结果尚不确定,因为仅有少数研究包含了长期生存数据。SILS 治疗 CRC 仍处于研究的早期阶段。需要进一步的研究,特别是大规模的前瞻性随机对照试验,以评估 SILS 治疗 CRC 的价值。

方法

本研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性、平行组随机对照临床试验,旨在比较 SILS 与传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)治疗 CRC 的长期肿瘤学结果。符合条件的 710 例患者将按照 1:1 的比例使用中央、动态、分层区组随机化方法分为 SILS 组或 CLS 组。年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间,性别不限,诊断为腹膜反射以上的 cT1-4aN0-2M0 期 CRC,肿瘤大小不超过 5cm 的患者将被纳入研究。主要终点是 3 年无病生存率(DFS)。次要终点包括:术中结果、术后恢复、术后疼痛评估、病理结果、早期发病率和死亡率、美容效果、生活质量、3 年总生存率(OS)、切口疝发生率、5 年 DFS 和 5 年 OS。前两次随访将安排在术后 1 个月和 3 个月,然后在前两年每 3 个月随访一次,接下来的 3 年每 6 个月随访一次。

讨论

目前,尚无设计用于研究 SILS 治疗 CRC 的长期肿瘤学结果的随机对照试验(RCT)。本研究有望为 SILS 与 CLS 治疗 CRC 的肿瘤学结果提供临床证据,以促进其广泛应用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04527861(注册于 2020 年 8 月 27 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa22/9264567/8d1bfe1c59e2/12885_2022_9821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa22/9264567/8d1bfe1c59e2/12885_2022_9821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa22/9264567/8d1bfe1c59e2/12885_2022_9821_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的肿瘤学结局比较(CSILS):一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照临床试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.
2
A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经脐单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的安全性研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5.
3
Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠乙状结肠癌的长期疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11500-2.
4
Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌的临床及肿瘤学效果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1117-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6370-2. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.单孔加一孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠乙状结肠癌的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):840-848. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6350-6. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Long-term oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.单切口腹腔镜结肠癌手术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3200-3208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08629-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
7
Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效:一项单中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机临床试验
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 25;11:762147. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762147. eCollection 2021.
8
Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery.直肠乙状结肠癌治疗方案的评估:单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术、单切口腹腔镜手术及传统腹腔镜手术
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2437-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5244-8. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
10
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的疗效比较:随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1407-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03918-6. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.单孔机器人与单切口腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:结直肠癌手术中的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10629-2. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人手术治疗结直肠癌:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 May 13;15(5):e38956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38956. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Retrospective analysis of surgical and oncological results of laparoscopic surgeries performed by residents of coloproctology.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效:一项单中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机临床试验
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 25;11:762147. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762147. eCollection 2021.
2
Long-term Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Single-incision Versus Multi-port Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer.单切口与多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗结肠癌的随机对照试验的长期结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1060-1065. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004252.
3
Short-term Outcomes of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: The SIMPLE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
腹腔镜手术在结直肠外科住院医师中的手术和肿瘤学结果的回顾性分析。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 May 22;50:e20233404. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233404-en. eCollection 2023.
单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌的短期疗效比较:SIMPLE 多中心随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2021 Feb 1;273(2):217-223. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003882.
4
Clinical and oncological outcomes of single-incision vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的临床与肿瘤学结局。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5294-5303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07317-5. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Single-incision Laparoscopy Versus Multiport Laparoscopy for Colonic Surgery: A Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的比较:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):740-746. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836.
6
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
The Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Technique in the Age of Single-Incision Laparoscopy: An Effective Alternative to Avoid Open Conversion in Colorectal Surgery.手辅助腹腔镜技术在单孔腹腔镜时代的作用:结直肠手术中避免转为开腹手术的有效替代方法
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):415-421. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0553. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
8
Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 解剖治疗 II 期或 III 期结肠癌的生存结局(JCOG0404):一项 III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Can Be Performed Safely and Appropriately for Colon Cancer: Short-Term Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.单孔腹腔镜手术可安全、适用于结肠癌:一项初步随机对照试验的短期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 May;27(5):501-509. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0467. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy.单切口与多孔腹腔镜结肠切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1276-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10212. Epub 2016 Aug 10.