Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kawaramachi Hirokoji Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):2367-2374. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07234-5. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
In Japan, laser light source (Laser) endoscopy is widely available, and the characteristics of light-emitting diode light source (LED) endoscopy have not been clarified.
We assessed the visibility of early gastric cancers (EGCs) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-associated gastritis for LED endoscopy compared with laser endoscopy using white-light imaging (WLI) and linked color imaging (LCI).
We assessed 99 lesions between February 2019 and March 2020. The visibility was scored from four (excellent visibility) to one (poor visibility) by evaluating videos including EGCs and gastric mucosa captured using WLI and LCI with LED endoscopy (LED-WLI and LED-LCI, respectively) and laser endoscopy (Laser-WLI and Laser-LCI, respectively). The primary end point was the non-inferiority of the visibility of EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis between LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI.
The visibility scores of EGCs for LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI were 3.14/2.97 and 3.39/3.35, respectively. The visibility scores of H. pylori-associated gastritis [intestinal metaplasia (IM), diffuse redness (DR), regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) and map-like redness (MR)] for LED-/Laser-WLI and LED-/Laser-LCI were 3.05/2.85 and 3.60/3.50 (IM), 2.76/2.50 and 2.96/2.86 (DR), 2.69/2.44 and 2.77/2.62 (RAC) and 2.97/2.75 and 3.39/3.27 (MR). Non-inferiority was demonstrated for visualizing EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis.
LED-WLI and LED-LCI can be used to visualize EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis with non-inferiority to Laser-WLI and Laser-LCI. Furthermore, even with LED, LCI was more effective than WLI for evaluating EGCs and H. pylori-associated gastritis. Therefore, LED endoscopy can be used to detect EGCs and evaluate H. pylori-associated gastritis accurately.
在日本,激光光源(Laser)内镜广泛应用,而发光二极管光源(LED)内镜的特点尚不清楚。
我们评估了白光成像(WLI)和链接色成像(LCI)下 LED 内镜与激光内镜相比对早期胃癌(EGC)和幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)相关胃炎的可视性。
我们评估了 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 3 月间的 99 个病变。通过评估包括 EGC 和胃黏膜在内的视频,对 LED 内镜(LED-WLI 和 LED-LCI)和激光内镜(Laser-WLI 和 Laser-LCI)获得的 WLI 和 LCI 图像的可视性进行评分,范围从 4(极好的可视性)到 1(差的可视性)。主要终点是非劣效性,即 LED- / Laser-WLI 和 LED- / Laser-LCI 对 EGC 和 H. pylori 相关胃炎的可视性。
LED- / Laser-WLI 和 LED- / Laser-LCI 对 EGC 的可视性评分分别为 3.14/2.97 和 3.39/3.35。LED- / Laser-WLI 和 LED- / Laser-LCI 对 H. pylori 相关胃炎[肠上皮化生(IM)、弥漫性发红(DR)、收集静脉规则排列(RAC)和地图样发红(MR)]的可视性评分分别为 3.05/2.85 和 3.60/3.50(IM)、2.76/2.50 和 2.96/2.86(DR)、2.69/2.44 和 2.77/2.62(RAC)和 2.97/2.75 和 3.39/3.27(MR)。可视化 EGC 和 H. pylori 相关胃炎方面,LED- / Laser-WLI 和 LED- / Laser-LCI 具有非劣效性。
LED-WLI 和 LED-LCI 可用于可视化 EGC 和 H. pylori 相关胃炎,与 Laser-WLI 和 Laser-LCI 相比具有非劣效性。此外,即使使用 LED,LCI 也比 WLI 更有效地评估 EGC 和 H. pylori 相关胃炎。因此,LED 内镜可用于准确检测 EGC 并评估 H. pylori 相关胃炎。