Suppr超能文献

重新思考常规:2017 年国家手术质量改进计划队列中,美国麻醉医师学会 1 级和 2 级患者在低风险门诊手术前的常规实验室检查。

Rethinking the routine: Preoperative laboratory testing among American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery in the 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohort.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2022 Feb;171(2):267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.036. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Routine preoperative laboratory testing is not recommended for American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1 or 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

The 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was retrospectively queried for American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients who underwent low-risk, elective outpatient anorectal, breast, endocrine, gynecologic, hernia, otolaryngology, oral-maxillofacial, orthopedic, plastic/reconstructive, urologic, and vascular operations. Preoperative laboratory testing was defined as any chemistry, hematology, coagulation, or liver function studies obtained ≤30 days preoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between those with and without testing. The numbers needed to test to prevent serious morbidity or any complication were calculated. Laboratory testing costs were estimated using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.

RESULTS

Of 111,589 patients studied, 57,590 (51.6%) received preoperative laboratory testing; 26,709 (46.4%) had at least 1 abnormal result. Factors associated with receiving preoperative laboratory testing included increasing age, female sex, non-White race/ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2, diabetes, dyspnea, hypertension, obesity, and steroid use. Mortality did not differ between patients with and without testing. The complication rate was 2.5% among tested patients and 1.7% among patients without tests (P < .01). The numbers needed to test was 599 for serious morbidity and 133 for any complication. An estimated $373 million annually is spent on preoperative laboratory testing in this population.

CONCLUSION

Despite American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, a majority of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients undergo preoperative laboratory testing before elective low-risk outpatient surgery. The differences in the rates of complications between patients with and without testing is low. Preoperative testing should be used more judiciously in this population, which may lead to cost savings.

摘要

背景

对于美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分类 1 或 2 的低风险非住院手术患者,不建议常规进行术前实验室检查。

方法

回顾性查询 2017 年国家手术质量改进计划数据集,纳入接受低风险择期门诊肛肠、乳腺、内分泌、妇科、疝、耳鼻喉、口腔颌面、骨科、整形/重建、泌尿科和血管手术的 ASA 分级 1 和 2 患者。术前实验室检查定义为≤30 天内获得的任何化学、血液学、凝血或肝功能检查。比较有检查和无检查患者的人口统计学、合并症和结局。计算预防严重发病率或任何并发症所需的检查数量。使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的数据估计实验室检查成本。

结果

在研究的 111589 名患者中,57590 名(51.6%)接受了术前实验室检查;26709 名(46.4%)至少有 1 项异常结果。接受术前实验室检查的相关因素包括年龄增加、女性、非白种人、ASA 分级 2、糖尿病、呼吸困难、高血压、肥胖和使用类固醇。有检查和无检查患者的死亡率无差异。检查患者的并发症发生率为 2.5%,无检查患者为 1.7%(P<0.01)。预防严重发病率需要检查 599 次,预防任何并发症需要检查 133 次。估计该人群每年在术前实验室检查上花费 3.73 亿美元。

结论

尽管有 ASA 指南,但大多数 ASA 分级 1 和 2 的患者在接受择期低风险非住院手术前仍进行术前实验室检查。有检查和无检查患者的并发症发生率差异较低。在该人群中,术前检查应更谨慎使用,这可能会节省成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验