Catena U, Biasioli A, Paglietti C, Tarantino V, Pellecchia G, Esposito G, Previtera F, Zermano S, Arcieri M, Graziano A, Dinoi G, Ciano F, Driul L, Draisci G, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Vizzielli G, Restaino S
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):295-300. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.027.
Despite discouragement from many scientific societies, routine preoperative testing remains a common practice. Minor gynaecological surgery, being widely performed in everyday practice, represents an opportunity for implementing cost-reduction policies by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic assessments.
To assess whether performing routine preoperative blood tests affects postoperative complications and cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery.
An interim subgroup analysis of a retrospective study conducted by Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli (Rome) and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (Udine) was performed. Patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia were included. The studied population was divided based on the preoperative work up. Clinical data, surgical features and complications were collected.
Intraoperative and postoperative complications, healthcare expenditure in two groups.
Subgroup analysis included 1191 patients in Centre A (Rome) who underwent routine complete preoperative tests and 500 patients in Centre B (Udine), who underwent exams only if indicated. Population characteristics were similar in two groups. Postoperative complications were observed in 1.2% and 1.4% of cases in Group A and Group B, respectively (p=0.70). Severe complications occurred in 0.3% of cases in Group A and 0.4% in Group B. Group B showed a cost saving of approximately 70 Euros per procedure (p < 0.001).
Preliminary data indicate that routine perioperative assessment did not reduce complication rates, hospital readmissions or surgical reinterventions. Given the high number of procedures, performing specific preoperative tests only when indicated may result in significant cost reduction.
WHAT IS NEW?: This study selectively highlights the potential benefits to overall public health expenditure that could be achieved through stricter adherence to guidelines on preoperative assessment in minor gynaecological surgery.
尽管受到许多科学协会的劝阻,但术前常规检查仍是一种常见做法。小型妇科手术在日常实践中广泛开展,这为通过避免不必要的诊断评估来实施成本降低政策提供了契机。
评估进行术前常规血液检查是否会影响接受小型妇科手术患者的术后并发症及成本效益。
对由罗马的圣心天主教大学综合医院基金会和乌迪内的弗留利中央大学卫生机构进行的一项回顾性研究进行中期亚组分析。纳入接受全身麻醉手术的患者。根据术前检查情况对研究人群进行分组。收集临床数据、手术特征和并发症情况。
两组的术中及术后并发症、医疗保健支出。
亚组分析纳入了A中心(罗马)1191例接受术前常规全面检查的患者和B中心(乌迪内)500例仅在有指征时才进行检查的患者。两组人群特征相似。A组和B组术后并发症发生率分别为1.2%和1.4%(p = 0.70)。A组严重并发症发生率为0.3%,B组为0.4%。B组每例手术节省成本约70欧元(p < 0.001)。
初步数据表明,围手术期常规评估并未降低并发症发生率、住院再入院率或手术再次干预率。鉴于手术数量众多,仅在有指征时进行特定术前检查可能会显著降低成本。
本研究有针对性地强调了通过更严格遵守小型妇科手术术前评估指南可能为总体公共卫生支出带来的潜在益处。