Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Stanford -Surgical Policy Improvement Research and Education Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(14):3209-3215. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08287-0. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
Healthcare agencies and perioperative professional organizations recommend avoiding preoperative screening tests for low-risk surgical procedures. However, low-value preoperative tests are still commonly ordered even for generally healthy patients and active strategies to reduce this testing have not been adequately described.
We sought to learn from hospitals with either high levels of testing or that had recently reduced use of low-value screening tests (aka "delta sites") about reasons for testing and active deimplementation strategies they used to effectively improve practice.
Qualitative study of semi-structured telephone interviews.
We identified facilities in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with high or recently improved burden of potentially low-value preoperative testing for carpal tunnel release and cataract surgery. We recruited perioperative clinicians to participate.
Questions focused on reasons to order preoperative screening tests for patients undergoing low-risk surgery and, more importantly, what strategies had been successfully used to reduce testing. A framework method was used to identify common improvement strategies and specific care delivery innovations.
Thirty-five perioperative clinicians (e.g., hand surgeons, ophthalmologists, anesthesiologists, primary care providers, directors of preoperative clinics, nurses) from 29 VHA facilities participated. Facilities that successfully reduced the burden of low-value testing shared many improvement strategies (e.g., building consensus among stakeholders; using evidence/norm-based education and persuasion; clarifying responsibility for ordering tests) to implement different care delivery innovations (e.g., pre-screening to decide if a preop clinic evaluation is necessary; establishing a dedicated preop clinic for low-risk procedures).
We identified a menu of common improvement strategies and specific care delivery innovations that might be helpful for institutions trying to design their own quality improvement programs to reduce low-value preoperative testing given their unique structure, resources, and constraints.
医疗机构和围手术期专业组织建议避免对低风险手术进行术前筛查。然而,即使是一般健康的患者和积极的策略也没有充分描述来减少这种检测,低价值的术前检测仍然经常被订购。
我们试图从检测水平较高或最近减少低价值筛查检测(又称“三角洲站点”)的医院中了解他们检测的原因以及他们用来有效改善实践的积极取消策略。
半结构化电话访谈的定性研究。
我们在美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中确定了具有较高或最近改善的腕管松解和白内障手术潜在低价值术前检测负担的设施。我们招募围手术期临床医生参与。
问题集中在对接受低风险手术的患者进行术前筛查的原因,更重要的是,成功减少检测的策略。使用框架方法确定常见的改进策略和特定的医疗保健提供创新。
来自 29 个 VHA 设施的 35 名围手术期临床医生(例如,手外科医生、眼科医生、麻醉师、初级保健提供者、术前诊所主任、护士)参与了此次研究。成功减轻低价值检测负担的设施分享了许多改进策略(例如,在利益相关者之间建立共识;使用基于证据/规范的教育和说服;明确测试订单的责任),以实施不同的医疗保健提供创新(例如,预先筛选以决定是否需要进行术前诊所评估;为低风险手术建立专门的术前诊所)。
我们确定了一系列常见的改进策略和特定的医疗保健提供创新,这些策略和创新可能有助于机构根据其独特的结构、资源和限制,设计自己的质量改进计划,以减少低价值的术前检测。