Suppr超能文献

正颌外科学中的抗生素预防:系统评价概述。

Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: an overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av. Ipiranga, n.6681, Building 6, Porto Alegre, RS, 91530-001, Brazil.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av. Ipiranga, n.6681, Building 6, Porto Alegre, RS, 91530-001, Brazil.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Dec;59(10):1174-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 18.

Abstract

The purpose of this overview was to assess different antibiotic regimens used in orthognathic surgery and to establish an evidence-based protocol so that beneficial and adverse effects can be determined. A comprehensive literature search for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library until March 2020. Grey literature was investigated in Google Scholar, and a manual search was done of references lists. Two meta-analyses and four systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The AMSTAR-2-tool was used to ascertain the potential risk of bias in the included studies, which presented moderate to high methodological quality. Lower infection rates were associated with long-term therapies of penicillin, cefazolin-cephalexin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic-acid, with rates varying from 0% - 3.13%. Higher rates were reported in placebo groups (52.6%) and short-term penicillin therapy (60%). Side effects were reported with cefazolin, clindamycin, and penicillin therapies, including nausea, pain, swelling, headache, vomiting, and skin rash. Evidence suggests that long-term antibiotics can reduce the risk of a surgical site infection (SSI) in orthognathic surgery, but there is uncertainty regarding the effects of one dose of antibiotics preoperatively versus short-term antibiotics. In the same way, intravenous penicillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid kept the infection rates associated with bimaxillary procedures under 3.5%.

摘要

本文旨在评估正颌手术中使用的不同抗生素方案,并制定一个基于证据的方案,以便确定其有益和不良反应。对 MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中的系统评价和/或荟萃分析进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 3 月。在 Google Scholar 中调查了灰色文献,并对参考文献列表进行了手动搜索。有两项荟萃分析和四项系统评价符合纳入标准。使用 AMSTAR-2 工具来确定纳入研究的潜在偏倚风险,这些研究具有中度至高度的方法学质量。与短期青霉素治疗(60%)相比,长期使用青霉素、头孢唑林-头孢氨苄和阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗的感染率较低,为 0%-3.13%。在安慰剂组(52.6%)和短期青霉素治疗中报告了更高的感染率。头孢唑林、克林霉素和青霉素治疗均有不良反应报告,包括恶心、疼痛、肿胀、头痛、呕吐和皮疹。有证据表明,长期使用抗生素可以降低正颌手术中手术部位感染(SSI)的风险,但对于术前单次使用抗生素与短期使用抗生素的效果存在不确定性。同样,静脉注射青霉素、头孢唑林、克林霉素和阿莫西林-克拉维酸可将双颌手术的感染率控制在 3.5%以下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验