• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What Matters to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis When Facing Medical or Non-Medical Treatment Decisions?类风湿关节炎患者在面对医疗或非医疗治疗决策时,什么对他们重要?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Aug 24;15:1827-1841. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S322257. eCollection 2021.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.慢性肾脏病就诊中的共同决策:患者的决策角色偏好和体验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
8
Functional capacity vs side effects: treatment attributes to consider when individualising treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.功能容量与副作用:类风湿关节炎患者个体化治疗时需考虑的治疗属性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;41(3):695-704. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05961-8. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Making space for patients' preferences in precision medicine: a qualitative study exploring perspectives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.为精准医学中的患者偏好留出空间:一项探索类风湿关节炎患者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e058303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058303.
10
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the multiple dimensions of ageing: 5Ms for the rheumatologist.理解衰老的多维度:风湿病学家的 5M。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;6(12):e892-e902. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00230-3. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Person-Centered Coordinated Care Experience of People With Long-Term Conditions in the Balearic Islands Measured by the P3CEQ.通过P3CEQ衡量巴利阿里群岛慢性病患者以患者为中心的协调护理体验。
Health Serv Insights. 2024 Jun 13;17:11786329241258856. doi: 10.1177/11786329241258856. eCollection 2024.
3
Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations.荷兰医患互动探索性观察研究:在真实的录音咨询中作为共同决策的一部分,对个人观点启发的操作化。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e079540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.澄清价值观:一项更新和扩展的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):801-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211037946.
2
Proposal for a Framework to Enable Elicitation of Preferences for Clients in Need of Long-Term Care.关于建立一个能够引出长期护理需求客户偏好的框架的提议。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Aug 25;14:1553-1566. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S257501. eCollection 2020.
3
"Mastering a New Life Situation" - Patients' Preferences of Treatment Outcomes in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis - A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.“掌控新生活状况”——早期类风湿关节炎患者对治疗结果的偏好——一项纵向定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Aug 13;14:1421-1433. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S253507. eCollection 2020.
4
Genomic Testing for Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoid Cancers: Understanding Patient Values.复发/难治性淋巴肿瘤的基因组检测:了解患者价值观。
Patient. 2021 Mar;14(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00448-1.
5
Eliciting What Matters Most to People: The Whiteboard Initiative Proof of Concept.引出对人们最重要的事情:白板计划概念验证。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):767-768. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00435-6.
6
Shared Decision-Making Measures: A Systematic Review.共享决策措施:系统评价。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Apr/Jun;29(2):54-66. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000250.
7
Exploring healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology.探讨风湿病学中医疗保健专业人员在共享决策方面的知识、态度和经验。
RMD Open. 2020 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001121.
8
Patient Decision Aid (PDA) for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Reduces Decisional Conflict and Improves Readiness for Treatment Decision Making.患者决策辅助工具(PDA)可降低类风湿关节炎患者的决策冲突,提高治疗决策准备度。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00381-y.
9
International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Set of Outcomes That Matter to People Living With Inflammatory Arthritis: Consensus From an International Working Group.国际健康结局测量联合会炎症性关节炎患者关心的结局指标集:国际工作组的共识。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1556-1565. doi: 10.1002/acr.23799.
10
Call for action: how to improve use of patient-reported outcomes to guide clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.行动呼吁:如何改善患者报告结局的使用以指导类风湿关节炎的临床决策。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Jun;38(6):935-947. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4005-5. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

类风湿关节炎患者在面对医疗或非医疗治疗决策时,什么对他们重要?

What Matters to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis When Facing Medical or Non-Medical Treatment Decisions?

作者信息

Cornelissen Lisa Emily, van der Mark Elise J, Pennings Patricia, Maat Bertha, Foekens Theo, Willemsen-de Mey Gerardine, Voogdt-Pruis Helene R

机构信息

National Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.

VU Amsterdam, Athena Institute, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Aug 24;15:1827-1841. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S322257. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S322257
PMID:34465982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8403072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In rheumatoid arthritis care, patients and healthcare professionals regularly face health treatment decisions. Sorting out what matters to a patient as being relevant to a specific decision is therefore essential.

METHODS

An explorative mixed-methods study was performed to investigate patients' values for health treatment decisions and their importance in order to develop a future decision aid on value clarification. Ten semi-structured interviews with patient partners were conducted followed by an online survey among the broader population of patients. Qualitative content analysis was performed. Data from the online survey were analysed descriptively and quantitatively.

RESULTS

According to patients, 17 important health treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis care can occur. The most commonly reported decisions concerned the use of medication. A variety of values may guide patients' health treatment decisions. We found 66 values among four domains of values - decisional, situational, external and global. Among decisional values, reported main values were a) effectiveness of treatment on inflammation, functioning, pain and fatigue; b) avoiding negative side-effects; and c) keeping in good physical condition. In addition, situational values turned out to be a) staying independent; b) being able to meet people; and c) leading as normal a life as possible. Furthermore, patients prefer healthcare professionals who a) take comorbidity into account, b) have enough time, and c) take the patient seriously in their choices - the external values. Finally, as global values were expressed a) autonomy; b) self-image, and c) intimacy. All values are specified by underlying quotes, for example, the value effectiveness on inflammation; "That inflammation has got to go, because you've then got the risk that you'll develop all kinds of things in the course of time".

CONCLUSION

A variety of values may guide patients' health treatment decisions within rheumatoid arthritis care. Patients and professionals should discuss patients' values continuously.

摘要

背景

在类风湿关节炎护理中,患者和医护人员经常面临健康治疗决策。因此,梳理出对患者而言与特定决策相关的重要事项至关重要。

方法

开展了一项探索性混合方法研究,以调查患者对健康治疗决策的价值观及其重要性,以便开发未来关于价值观澄清的决策辅助工具。对患者伴侣进行了10次半结构化访谈,随后在更广泛的患者群体中进行了在线调查。进行了定性内容分析。对在线调查的数据进行了描述性和定量分析。

结果

患者认为,类风湿关节炎护理中可能出现17项重要的健康治疗决策。最常报告的决策涉及药物使用。多种价值观可能指导患者的健康治疗决策。我们在四个价值观领域——决策性、情境性、外部性和全局性中发现了66种价值观。在决策性价值观中,报告的主要价值观是:a)治疗对炎症、功能、疼痛和疲劳的有效性;b)避免负面副作用;c)保持良好的身体状况。此外,情境性价值观结果是:a)保持独立;b)能够与人交往;c)尽可能正常地生活。此外,患者更喜欢以下医护人员:a)考虑合并症;b)有足够时间;c)认真对待患者的选择——外部性价值观。最后,作为全局性价值观表达的是:a)自主性;b)自我形象;c)亲密关系。所有价值观都由相关引语具体说明,例如,炎症方面的有效性价值观;“炎症必须消除,因为随着时间的推移,你有患上各种疾病的风险”。

结论

在类风湿关节炎护理中,多种价值观可能指导患者的健康治疗决策。患者和专业人员应持续讨论患者的价值观。