• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于数据的方法评估社会流行病学研究年会主要报告形式中的性别和隶属关系代表性。

A Data-Based Approach to Evaluating Representation by Gender and Affiliation in Key Presentation Formats at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1710-1720. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab080.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwab080
PMID:34467404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8579028/
Abstract

The annual meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research (SER) is a major forum for sharing new research and promoting the career development of participants. Because of this, evaluating representation in key presentation formats is critical. For the 3,257 presentations identified at the 2015-2017 SER annual meetings, we evaluated presenter characteristics, including gender, affiliation, subject area, and h-index, and representation in 3 highlighted presentation formats: platform talks (n = 382), invited symposium talks (n = 273), and chairing a concurrent contributed session or symposium (n = 188). Data were abstracted from SER records, abstract booklets, and programs. Gender was assessed using GenderChecker software, and h-index was determined using the Scopus application programming interface. Log-binomial models were adjusted for participant characteristics and conference year. In adjusted models, women were less likely than men to present an invited symposium talk (relative risk = 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.81) compared with all participants with accepted abstracts. Researchers from US public universities, US government institutions, and international institutions were less likely to present a symposium talk or to chair a concurrent contributed session or symposium than were researchers from US private institutions. The research areas that were most represented in platform talks were epidemiologic methods, social epidemiology, and cardiovascular epidemiology. Our findings suggest differences in representation by gender, affiliation, and subject area after accounting for h-index.

摘要

流行病学研究学会(SER)的年会是分享新研究和促进参与者职业发展的主要论坛。因此,评估关键呈现形式中的代表性至关重要。在 2015-2017 年 SER 年会上确定的 3257 个报告中,我们评估了报告人的特征,包括性别、所属机构、研究领域和 h 指数,以及在 3 种突出的呈现形式中的代表性:平台演讲(n=382)、特邀研讨会演讲(n=273)和主持一次同期专题会议或研讨会(n=188)。数据从 SER 记录、摘要手册和计划中提取。使用 GenderChecker 软件评估性别,使用 Scopus 应用程序编程接口确定 h 指数。使用逻辑二项式模型对参与者特征和会议年份进行调整。在调整后的模型中,与所有接受摘要的参与者相比,女性发表特邀研讨会演讲的可能性低于男性(相对风险=0.60,95%置信区间:0.45,0.81)。来自美国公立大学、美国政府机构和国际机构的研究人员发表研讨会演讲或主持同期专题会议或研讨会的可能性低于来自美国私立机构的研究人员。在平台演讲中最具代表性的研究领域是流行病学方法、社会流行病学和心血管流行病学。在考虑 h 指数后,我们的研究结果表明在性别、隶属关系和研究领域方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
A Data-Based Approach to Evaluating Representation by Gender and Affiliation in Key Presentation Formats at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research.基于数据的方法评估社会流行病学研究年会主要报告形式中的性别和隶属关系代表性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1710-1720. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab080.
2
Invited Commentary: The Society for Epidemiologic Research Annual Meeting-Room to Improve Gender Equity.特邀评论:流行病学研究学会年会——改善性别平等的空间。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1724-1726. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab082.
3
Invited Commentary: The Society for Epidemiologic Research-Striving for Equity in Our Own Backyard.特邀评论:流行病学研究学会——在自家后院努力实现公平。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1721-1723. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab081.
4
Invited Commentary: The Society for Epidemiologic Research's Commitment to Diversity and Equity-Pathways to Filling the Glass.特邀评论:社会流行病学研究协会对多样性和公平的承诺——填补玻璃。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1727-1729. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab083.
5
Quality at the American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting: Gender Balance Among Invited Speakers and Associations with Panel Success.美国放射肿瘤学会年会上的质量:特邀演讲者中的性别平衡与小组成功的关联。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Aug 1;104(5):987-996. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
The Fate of Abstracts Presented at the 2013 and 2014 Annual Meetings of the Romanian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2013年和2014年罗马尼亚胃肠病学和肝病学会年会上发表摘要的去向
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Dec;25(4):533-536. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.254.chi.
7
Publication of Podium Presentations at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meetings: 2008-2012.2008 - 2012年骨科创伤协会年会讲台发言的发表情况
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 May;32(5):e166-e170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001045.
8
Gender Representation at Conferences, Executive Boards, and Program Committees in Otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科学会议、执行委员会和项目委员会中的性别代表性。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):E373-E379. doi: 10.1002/lary.28823. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
You're From … Where, Again? A Critical Assessment of Institutional Diversity in the Society for Epidemiologic Research.你来自……哪里,能再说一次吗?对流行病学研究学会机构多样性的批判性评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;189(10):1026-1029. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa106.
10
Recommendations to the Society for Epidemiologic Research for Further Promoting Diversity and Inclusion at the Annual Meeting and Beyond.向流行病学研究学会提出的关于进一步推动年会及其他活动多样性和包容性的建议。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;189(10):1037-1041. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa110.

引用本文的文献

1
Nobles et al. Respond to Commentaries on Representation by Gender and Affiliation in Key Presentation Formats at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research.诺布尔斯等人回应了关于在流行病学研究学会年会上主要展示形式中性别和所属机构代表性的评论。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 1;190(9):1733-1734. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab084.
2
Response to Society for Epidemiologic Research Diversity and Inclusion Survey Commentaries.对流行病学研究学会多样性与包容性调查评论的回应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;189(10):1053-1056. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa103.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Representation and Perceived Inclusion among Members in the Society for Epidemiologic Research.评估流行病学研究学会成员中的代表性和感知到的包容性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Jan 7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz281.
2
Unconscious Bias: Addressing the Hidden Impact on Surgical Education.无意识偏见:解决手术教育中的隐性影响。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2019 Aug;29(3):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Gender equity in epidemiology: a policy brief.流行病学中的性别公平:政策简报。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;35:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs: Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century.学术放射肿瘤学主席的性别、专业经验和个人特征:为 21 世纪的人才储备提供数据。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Aug 1;104(5):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Perceived Barriers to Career Progression Among Early-Career Epidemiologists: Report of a Workshop at the 22nd World Congress of Epidemiology.早期职业流行病学家职业发展的感知障碍:第22届世界流行病学大会研讨会报告
J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 5;29(1):38-41. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180184. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
6
Critical race theory as a bridge in science training: the California State University, Northridge BUILD PODER program.作为科学培训桥梁的批判种族理论:加利福尼亚州立大学北岭分校的BUILD PODER项目
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):21. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0089-2. eCollection 2017.
7
Implicit Bias in Pediatric Academic Medicine.儿科学术医学中的内隐偏见。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2017;109(3):156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
8
Leaky pipeline, gender bias, self-selection or all three? A quantitative analysis of gender balance at an international palliative care research conference.漏洞百出的流程、性别偏见、自我选择,还是三者皆有?对一次国际姑息治疗研究会议上的性别平衡情况进行定量分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jun;9(2):146-148. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001211. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
The Changing Face of Epidemiology: Gender Disparities in Citations?流行病学的变化面貌:引用方面的性别差异?
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):159-168. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000593.
10
Building Bridges through Scientific Conferences.搭建科学会议之桥梁。
Cell. 2016 Nov 17;167(5):1155-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.006.