Suppr超能文献

成人脊柱畸形手术中的机械并发症:脊柱对线能解释一切吗?

Mechanical Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Can Spinal Alignment Explain Everything?

机构信息

Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Hospital Beneficente São Carlos, Farroupilha - RS, Brazil.

National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jan 1;47(1):E1-E9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004217.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to verify the validity of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score, SRS-Schwab, and Roussouly theoretical apex of lordosis in predicting mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Achieving adequate sagittal alignment is critical to obtain favorable outcomes in ASD surgery. It has been proposed that mechanical complications are largely secondary to postoperative spinal alignment.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive primary ASD cases that underwent deformity correction in the same institution over a 5-year period. Association between the 6-week postoperative spinal alignment classification and occurrence of mechanical complications on the last follow-up was assessed using logistic regressions. The discriminant capacity was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

58.3% (N = 49/84) of patients presented with mechanical complications and 32.1% (N = 27/84) underwent revision surgery. GAP score did not show discriminant ability to predict complications (AUC = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.66, P = 0.58). Conversely, the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier score demonstrated a statistically significant (although modest) predictive value for mechanical complications (AUC = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.54-0.79, P = 0.008). There was a significant association between pelvic tilt (PT) (P = 0.03) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P = 0.01) at 6 weeks postoperatively and the occurrence of later mechanical complications. There was no significant association between matched Roussouly theoretical apex of lordosis and final outcome (P = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

The results point to the complexity of mechanical failure and the high likelihood that causative factors are multifactorial and not limited to alignment measures. GAP score should be used with caution as it may not explain or predict mechanical failure based on alignment in all populations as originally expected. Future studies should focus on etiology, surgical technique, and patient factors in order to generate a more universal score that can be applied to all populations.Level of Evidence: 4.

摘要

研究设计

队列研究。

目的

我们的目标是验证全球对准和比例(GAP)评分、SRS-Schwab 评分和 Roussouly 理论前凸角在预测成人脊柱畸形(ASD)机械并发症方面的有效性。

背景资料概要

获得足够的矢状面对线是 ASD 手术获得良好结果的关键。已经提出机械并发症主要是术后脊柱对线不良的结果。

方法

回顾性分析了在同一机构接受畸形矫正的连续原发性 ASD 病例,时间跨度为 5 年。使用逻辑回归评估 6 周术后脊柱对线分类与末次随访时机械并发症发生之间的关系。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估判别能力。

结果

58.3%(N=49/84)的患者出现机械并发症,32.1%(N=27/84)行翻修手术。GAP 评分不能预测并发症(AUC=0.53,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.40-0.66,P=0.58)。相反,SRS-Schwab 矢状面修正评分对机械并发症具有统计学意义(尽管幅度较小)的预测价值(AUC=0.67,95%CI 为 0.54-0.79,P=0.008)。术后 6 周骨盆倾斜(PT)(P=0.03)和矢状垂直轴(SVA)(P=0.01)与后期机械并发症的发生有显著相关性。与匹配的 Roussouly 理论前凸角无显著相关性(P=0.47)。

结论

结果表明机械失败的复杂性很高,并且很可能导致失败的因素是多因素的,而不仅仅是对线测量。GAP 评分的使用应谨慎,因为它可能无法根据所有人的对线解释或预测机械失败。未来的研究应侧重于病因、手术技术和患者因素,以生成更普遍的评分,适用于所有人群。

证据水平

4。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验