• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗器械相关的压力性损伤与一家三级儿童医院的脑电图导联相关:一项回顾性图表审查。

Medical Device-related Pressure Injuries Associated With Electroencephalogram Leads in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; College of Nursing, Marquette University College of Nursing, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Sep;67(9):25-32.

PMID:34473641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) present a substantial safety risk for children who are hospitalized.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to describe patient and clinical characteristics of children who develop MDRPIs related to electroencephalogram (EEG) leads, determine risk factors associated with their development, and determine if there are common risk factors that can lead to actionable strategies to reduce MDRPIs related to EEG leads.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of the electronic health records of all 3136 children who had EEG lead placements between January 1, 2014, and April 16, 2018, at a large tertiary care children's hospital. Data abstracted included demographic variables, patient and pressure injury characteristics, as well as length of stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (24) of the 3136 children (0.8%) developed an MDRPI. Most were stage 2 pressure injuries. Patients who developed a pressure injury were significantly younger than patients who did not (median age, 0.9 and 5.2 years, respectively; P = .005). Fifty percent (50%) of all patients who developed pressure injuries were younger than 1 year of age compared with 27% of patients who did not develop pressure injuries. The median length of stay for patients in whom MDRPI developed was 84.5 days (interquartile range, 45-137) versus 3.0 days (interquartile range, 2-8) for those who did not develop an MDRPI (P < .001). The mortality rate during the hospital stay was 21% (n = 5) for those who developed MDPRIs versus 4% (n = 19) for those who did not (P = .002). All patients received standard preventive strategies.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MDRPIs in this patient population was significantly higher in younger and longer-stay patients, and their mortality rate was significantly higher. This suggests that the patients who developed an MDRPI were more critically ill than those who did not. Vigilant assessment and more research are needed to determine if there are appropriate strategies to reduce MDRPIs related to EEG lead placement.

摘要

背景

医疗器械相关性压力性损伤(MDRPI)给住院患儿带来了重大安全风险。

目的

本研究旨在描述与脑电图(EEG)导联相关的 MDRPI 患儿的患者和临床特征,确定与 MDRPI 相关的危险因素,并确定是否存在共同的危险因素,从而制定出可降低与 EEG 导联相关的 MDRPI 的策略。

方法

对 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 16 日期间在一家大型三级儿童保健医院接受 EEG 导联放置的 3136 名儿童的电子健康记录进行了回顾性审查。提取的数据包括人口统计学变量、患者和压力性损伤特征以及住院时间。

结果

3136 名儿童中有 24 名(0.8%)发生了 MDRPI。大多数为 2 期压力性损伤。发生压力性损伤的患者明显比未发生压力性损伤的患者年龄小(中位数年龄分别为 0.9 岁和 5.2 岁;P =.005)。所有发生压力性损伤的患者中,50%(50%)的年龄小于 1 岁,而未发生压力性损伤的患者中,这一比例为 27%(P <.001)。发生 MDRPI 的患者的中位住院时间为 84.5 天(四分位距,45-137),而未发生 MDRPI 的患者为 3.0 天(四分位距,2-8)(P <.001)。发生 MDRPI 的患者的住院期间死亡率为 21%(n = 5),而未发生 MDRPI 的患者为 4%(n = 19)(P =.002)。所有患者均接受了标准预防策略。

结论

在该患者人群中,年轻和住院时间较长的患者 MDRPI 的发生率显著更高,死亡率也显著更高。这表明发生 MDRPI 的患者比未发生 MDRPI 的患者病情更危急。需要进行更严密的评估和更多的研究,以确定是否有适当的策略来降低与 EEG 导联放置相关的 MDRPI。

相似文献

1
Medical Device-related Pressure Injuries Associated With Electroencephalogram Leads in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review.医疗器械相关的压力性损伤与一家三级儿童医院的脑电图导联相关:一项回顾性图表审查。
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Sep;67(9):25-32.
2
Incidence, characteristics and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries: An observational cohort study.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率、特征及危险因素:一项观察性队列研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103180. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103180. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study.成人重症监护病房中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的患病率、严重程度和特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13845. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in an Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study.医疗器械相关性压力损伤在重症监护病房中的横断面研究。
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Nov;67(11):26-32.
5
Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries in Infants and Children.婴儿和儿童与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;47(5):459-469. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000683.
6
Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study.重症患者自我负载相关和医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):453-467. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13022. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
7
Ambulance referral of more than 2 hours could result in a high prevalence of medical-device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) with characteristics different from some inpatient settings: a descriptive observational study.救护车转运时间超过 2 小时可能导致高比例的与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI),其特征与一些住院环境不同:一项描述性观察研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00815-9.
8
Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors.重症监护病房中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤发生率及相关危险因素。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Nov;32(4):564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
9
What is the incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in adults within the acute hospital setting? A systematic review.成人在急性医院环境中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤发生率是多少?系统评价。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Nov;30(4):489-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Determination of medical device-related pressure injury in COVID-19 patients: A prospective descriptive study.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者医疗器械相关性压力损伤的确定:一项前瞻性描述性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Feb;32(1):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Safety Culture in the Context of Critical Care: An Observational Study.重症监护背景下的患者安全文化:一项观察性研究。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(3):1792-1806. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14030133.
2
The relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events in Iranian hospitals: a survey among 360 nurses.伊朗医院患者安全文化与不良事件之间的关系:对360名护士的调查
Patient Saf Surg. 2023 Jul 26;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00369-6.
3
Review of Noninvasive Neuromonitoring Modalities in Children II: EEG, qEEG.儿童无创神经监测方式评估 II:脑电图、qEEG。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Dec;39(3):618-638. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01686-5. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Factors influencing the severity of medical device-related pressure injuries: Pressure injury staging comparison.影响医疗器械相关性压力损伤严重程度的因素:压力损伤分期比较。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2735-2741. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14147. Epub 2023 Mar 20.