Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Division of Health Science and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):453-467. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13022. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
There are two types of pressure injuries: self-load-related pressure injuries (PIs) and medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), but the differences in risk factors between PIs and MDRPIs have not yet been clarified. If risk factors for PIs and MDRPIs differ, preventive interventions should take this into account. This is a prospective cohort study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs in critically ill patients and to identify corresponding risk factors. The study included 1418 patients who were admitted to the critical care medical center of a single university hospital in Tokyo, Japan, between 1 December 2019 and 31 August 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the predictors in both the PI and MDRPI incidence and non-incidence groups. Predictors were based on data from the 0th disease day. The cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs was 4.6/1000 person-days and 3.6/1000 person-days, respectively. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that common risk factors for the occurrence of PIs and MDRPIs were possession of PI on admission, higher blood lactate, blood purification therapy, and positional restriction. The risk factors for PIs only were diabetes mellitus, septic shock, and a lower serum albumin level, while the risk factors for MDRPIs only were the D-dimer level and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation treatment. Therefore, prophylactic interventions need to consider these different risk factors.
与自身体重相关的压力性损伤(PI)和与医疗设备相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI),但 PI 和 MDRPI 的危险因素差异尚未阐明。如果 PI 和 MDRPI 的危险因素不同,预防干预措施应考虑到这一点。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在确定危重症患者中 PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率,并确定相应的危险因素。该研究纳入了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 31 日期间在日本东京某大学附属医院的重症监护医疗中心住院的 1418 例患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算 PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率。此外,还采用 Cox 比例风险模型分析 PI 和 MDRPI 发生率和未发生率组的预测因素。预测因素基于第 0 疾病日的数据。PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率分别为 4.6/1000 人天和 3.6/1000 人天。使用 Cox 比例风险模型进行的多变量分析表明,PI 和 MDRPI 发生的共同危险因素为入院时存在 PI、较高的血乳酸、血液净化治疗和体位限制。PI 的危险因素仅为糖尿病、感染性休克和较低的血清白蛋白水平,而 MDRPI 的危险因素仅为 D-二聚体水平和体外膜肺氧合治疗。因此,预防干预措施需要考虑这些不同的危险因素。