• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症患者自我负载相关和医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。

Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.

Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Division of Health Science and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):453-467. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13022. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/wrr.13022
PMID:35567569
Abstract

There are two types of pressure injuries: self-load-related pressure injuries (PIs) and medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), but the differences in risk factors between PIs and MDRPIs have not yet been clarified. If risk factors for PIs and MDRPIs differ, preventive interventions should take this into account. This is a prospective cohort study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs in critically ill patients and to identify corresponding risk factors. The study included 1418 patients who were admitted to the critical care medical center of a single university hospital in Tokyo, Japan, between 1 December 2019 and 31 August 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the predictors in both the PI and MDRPI incidence and non-incidence groups. Predictors were based on data from the 0th disease day. The cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs was 4.6/1000 person-days and 3.6/1000 person-days, respectively. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that common risk factors for the occurrence of PIs and MDRPIs were possession of PI on admission, higher blood lactate, blood purification therapy, and positional restriction. The risk factors for PIs only were diabetes mellitus, septic shock, and a lower serum albumin level, while the risk factors for MDRPIs only were the D-dimer level and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation treatment. Therefore, prophylactic interventions need to consider these different risk factors.

摘要

存在两种类型的压力性损伤

与自身体重相关的压力性损伤(PI)和与医疗设备相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI),但 PI 和 MDRPI 的危险因素差异尚未阐明。如果 PI 和 MDRPI 的危险因素不同,预防干预措施应考虑到这一点。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在确定危重症患者中 PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率,并确定相应的危险因素。该研究纳入了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 31 日期间在日本东京某大学附属医院的重症监护医疗中心住院的 1418 例患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算 PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率。此外,还采用 Cox 比例风险模型分析 PI 和 MDRPI 发生率和未发生率组的预测因素。预测因素基于第 0 疾病日的数据。PI 和 MDRPI 的累积发生率分别为 4.6/1000 人天和 3.6/1000 人天。使用 Cox 比例风险模型进行的多变量分析表明,PI 和 MDRPI 发生的共同危险因素为入院时存在 PI、较高的血乳酸、血液净化治疗和体位限制。PI 的危险因素仅为糖尿病、感染性休克和较低的血清白蛋白水平,而 MDRPI 的危险因素仅为 D-二聚体水平和体外膜肺氧合治疗。因此,预防干预措施需要考虑这些不同的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study.重症患者自我负载相关和医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):453-467. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13022. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Incidence, characteristics and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries: An observational cohort study.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率、特征及危险因素:一项观察性队列研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103180. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103180. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
Ambulance referral of more than 2 hours could result in a high prevalence of medical-device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) with characteristics different from some inpatient settings: a descriptive observational study.救护车转运时间超过 2 小时可能导致高比例的与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI),其特征与一些住院环境不同:一项描述性观察研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00815-9.
4
Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors.重症监护病房中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤发生率及相关危险因素。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Nov;32(4):564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study.成人重症监护病房中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的患病率、严重程度和特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13845. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in Hemodynamically Unstable Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.血流动力学不稳定的重症监护病房患者中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2024;51(4):276-282. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001081. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Care and Prevention Training Program (DevICeU): Effects on intensive care nurses' knowledge, prevention performance and point prevalence.医疗器械相关压力性损伤护理与预防培训项目(DevICeU):对重症监护护士知识、预防措施执行情况及现患率的影响
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Jun;82:103622. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103622. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科患者中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的发生率和患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Sep-Oct;72:e130-e138. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
9
Medical Device-related Pressure Injuries Associated With Electroencephalogram Leads in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review.医疗器械相关的压力性损伤与一家三级儿童医院的脑电图导联相关:一项回顾性图表审查。
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Sep;67(9):25-32.
10
Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study.医疗器械相关性压力性损伤在 ICU 中的发生率及危险因素的确定:一项描述性研究。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Mar 1;37(3):1-6. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000113.