Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Laboratory of Insect Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0257074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257074. eCollection 2021.
Changes in the acoustic signalling of animals occupying urban ecosystems is often associated with the masking effects of noise pollution, but the way in which they respond to noise pollution is not straightforward. An increasing number of studies indicate that responses can be case specific, and some species have been found to respond differently to high levels of natural versus anthropogenic noise, as well as different levels of the latter. While the perception of noise between species may vary with its source, amplitude and temporal features, some species may possess broader environmental tolerance to noise pollution, as they use higher frequency vocalizations that are less masked by low-frequency urban noise. In this study, we explored the song variation of two closely related leaf warblers, the Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita and the Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus, inhabiting urban green spaces and nonurban forests. The main goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of moderate levels of noise pollution on the songs of species which use higher frequency vocalizations and large frequency bandwidth. Previous studies found that the Common Chiffchaff modified their song in response to intense noise pollution, while no such data is available for the Willow Warbler. However, the majority of urban green spaces, which serve as wildlife hot spots in urban environments are usually polluted with moderate noise levels, which may not mask the acoustic signals of species that communicate with higher frequency. We analysed the spectral and temporal song parameters of both warblers and described the ambient noise present in males' territories. Additionally, we looked at the social and seasonal aspects of bird song, since there is more than just noise in urban ecosystems which may affect acoustic communication. We found no evidence for noise-related bird song divergence in either species, however, we showed that social factors, time of day and season influence certain Common Chiffchaff and Willow Warbler song characteristics. Lack of noise-related bird song divergence may be due to the relatively low variation in its amplitude or other noise features present within the song frequency range of the studied species. Similar results have previously been shown for a few songbird species inhabiting urban ecosystems. Although in many cases such results remain in the shadow of the positive ones, they all contribute to a better understanding of animal communication in urban ecosystems.
动物在城市生态系统中的声音信号的变化通常与噪声污染的掩蔽效应有关,但它们对噪声污染的反应方式并不简单。越来越多的研究表明,这种反应可能因情况而异,一些物种对自然噪声与人为噪声的高低水平的反应不同,以及后者的不同水平。虽然物种之间对噪声的感知可能因其来源、振幅和时间特征而有所不同,但有些物种可能对噪声污染具有更广泛的环境耐受性,因为它们使用的高频声音较少受到低频城市噪声的掩蔽。在这项研究中,我们探索了两种密切相关的叶莺,普通柳莺 Phylloscopus collybita 和林柳莺 Phylloscopus trochilus,在城市绿地和非城市森林中的歌声变化。我们研究的主要目的是评估中等水平噪声污染对使用高频发声和大频率带宽的物种歌声的影响。先前的研究发现,普通柳莺会根据强烈的噪声污染改变它们的歌声,而林柳莺则没有这种数据。然而,大多数城市绿地是城市环境中的野生动物热点,通常受到中等水平的噪声污染,这可能不会掩盖使用高频声音进行交流的物种的声音信号。我们分析了两种莺的光谱和时间歌声参数,并描述了雄鸟领地中存在的环境噪声。此外,我们还研究了鸟类歌声的社会和季节性方面,因为城市生态系统中不仅有噪声,还有可能影响声学通讯的其他因素。我们没有发现两种物种的歌声与噪声相关的分歧证据,但是,我们表明,社会因素、一天中的时间和季节会影响某些普通柳莺和林柳莺歌声的特征。缺乏与噪声相关的鸟类歌声分歧可能是由于研究物种的歌声频率范围内其振幅或其他噪声特征的相对变化较小。先前也有一些栖息在城市生态系统中的鸣禽物种表现出类似的结果。尽管在许多情况下,这些结果仍然被积极的结果所掩盖,但它们都有助于更好地理解城市生态系统中的动物通讯。