Mother Heart Care, Thrissur, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
Studies on the changes in the presentation and management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the COVID-19 pandemic from low- and middle-income countries are limited. We sought to determine the changes in the number of admissions, management practices, and outcomes of AMI during the pandemic period in India.
METHODS & RESULTS: In this two-timepoint cross-sectional study involving 187 hospitals across India, patients admitted with AMI between 15th March to 15th June in 2020 were compared with those admitted during the corresponding period of 2019. We included 41,832 consecutive adults with AMI. Admissions during the pandemic period (n = 16414) decreased by 35·4% as compared to the corresponding period in 2019 (n = 25418). We observed significant heterogeneity in this decline across India. The weekly average decrease in AMI admissions in 2020 correlated negatively with the number of COVID cases (r = -0·48; r = 0·2), but strongly correlated with the stringency of lockdown index (r = 0·95; r = 0·90). On a multi-level logistic regression, admissions were lower in 2020 with older age categories, tier 1 cities, and centers with high patient volume. Adjusted utilization rate of coronary angiography, and percutaneous coronary intervention decreased by 11·3%, and 5·9% respectively.
The magnitude of reduction in AMI admissions across India was not uniform. The nature, time course, and the patient demographics were different compared to reports from other countries, suggesting a significant impact due to the lockdown. These findings have important implications in managing AMI during the pandemic.
关于 COVID-19 大流行期间中低收入国家急性心肌梗死(AMI)表现和管理变化的研究有限。我们旨在确定印度大流行期间 AMI 入院人数、管理实践和结局的变化。
在这项涉及印度 187 家医院的两时点横断面研究中,比较了 2020 年 3 月 15 日至 6 月 15 日与 2019 年同期因 AMI 入院的患者。共纳入 41832 例连续成人 AMI 患者。与 2019 年同期(n=25418)相比,大流行期间(n=16414)的入院人数减少了 35.4%。这种下降在印度各地存在显著异质性。2020 年每周 AMI 入院人数的平均下降与 COVID 病例数呈负相关(r=-0.48;r=-0.2),但与封锁指数的严格程度密切相关(r=0.95;r=0.90)。在多水平逻辑回归中,2020 年的入院率较低,与年龄较大的年龄段、1 级城市和高患者量的中心有关。经校正的冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的使用率分别下降了 11.3%和 5.9%。
印度各地 AMI 入院人数减少的幅度并不一致。与其他国家的报告相比,其性质、时间进程和患者人口统计学特征不同,表明封锁造成了重大影响。这些发现对大流行期间管理 AMI 具有重要意义。