• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。

A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).

机构信息

Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration, Getulio Vargas Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
PMID:33686204
Abstract

COVID-19 has prompted unprecedented government action around the world. We introduce the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), a dataset that addresses the need for continuously updated, readily usable and comparable information on policy measures. From 1 January 2020, the data capture government policies related to closure and containment, health and economic policy for more than 180 countries, plus several countries' subnational jurisdictions. Policy responses are recorded on ordinal or continuous scales for 19 policy areas, capturing variation in degree of response. We present two motivating applications of the data, highlighting patterns in the timing of policy adoption and subsequent policy easing and reimposition, and illustrating how the data can be combined with behavioural and epidemiological indicators. This database enables researchers and policymakers to explore the empirical effects of policy responses on the spread of COVID-19 cases and deaths, as well as on economic and social welfare.

摘要

COVID-19 促使全球各国政府采取了前所未有的行动。我们引入了牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器(OxCGRT),这是一个数据集,旨在提供有关政策措施的持续更新、易于使用和可比较的信息。自 2020 年 1 月 1 日起,该数据捕获了与关闭和遏制、卫生和经济政策相关的政策,涵盖了 180 多个国家以及几个国家的次国家管辖区。政策反应按序或连续尺度记录在 19 个政策领域,捕捉了反应程度的变化。我们提出了数据的两个应用案例,强调了政策采用的时间模式以及随后的政策放宽和重新实施,并说明了如何将数据与行为和流行病学指标结合使用。该数据库使研究人员和政策制定者能够探索政策应对措施对 COVID-19 病例和死亡传播以及经济和社会福利的实际影响。

相似文献

1
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Effects of government policies on the spread of COVID-19 worldwide.政府政策对全球 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99368-9.
3
COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0).COVID-19 政府应对事件数据集(CoronaNet v.1.0)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):756-768. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0909-7. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Containment, Health, and Social Policies in the Time of COVID-19 - Determinants and Outcomes of Initial Responses across 120 Countries.《COVID-19 时期的遏制、健康和社会政策——120 个国家初始应对措施的决定因素和结果》
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Nov 11;36(10):1613-1624. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab115.
5
Utility of the Comprehensive Health and Stringency Indexes in Evaluating Government Responses for Containing the Spread of COVID-19 in India: Ecological Time-Series Study.综合健康与严格指数在评估印度政府控制新冠疫情传播措施中的效用:生态时间序列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 10;9:e38371. doi: 10.2196/38371.
6
The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on wave one Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries.非药物干预措施对第一波新冠死亡率的相对影响:130 个国家的自然实验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13546-6.
7
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
Are Stringent Containment and Closure Policies Associated with a Lower COVID-19 Spread Rate? Global Evidence.严格的遏制和封锁政策是否与较低的 COVID-19 传播率有关?全球证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031725.
9
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
10
Comparing the impact on COVID-19 mortality of self-imposed behavior change and of government regulations across 13 countries.比较 13 个国家中自我行为改变和政府法规对 COVID-19 死亡率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):874-884. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13688. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal pandemic control strategies and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States.美国新冠疫情的最佳防控策略及非药物干预措施的成本效益
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Sep 12;3(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00189-z.
2
Estimating CO emissions from international medical electives: a literature review and quantitative analysis.估算国际医学选修课程的二氧化碳排放量:文献综述与定量分析。
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jul 29;12(3):100453. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100453. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Modeling the Impacts of Governmental and Human Responses on COVID-19 Spread Using Statistical Machine Learning.
使用统计机器学习模拟政府和人类应对措施对新冠病毒传播的影响
Int J Digit Earth. 2024;17(1). doi: 10.1080/17538947.2024.2434651. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
4
Investigating the Relationships Between COVID-19 Cases, Public Health Interventions, Vaccine Coverage, and Mean Temperature in Ontario and Toronto.调查安大略省和多伦多市新冠病毒疾病病例、公共卫生干预措施、疫苗接种率与平均气温之间的关系。
Diseases. 2025 Aug 19;13(8):269. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080269.
5
The economic linkages of Covid-19 across sectors and regions in Europe.新冠疫情在欧洲各部门和地区之间的经济联系。
SERIEs (Berl). 2025;16(1):5-81. doi: 10.1007/s13209-025-00305-0. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
6
Understanding the interplay between epidemiological and social cognitve drivers of behaviour change during the Covid-19 pandemic.了解新冠疫情期间行为改变的流行病学和社会认知驱动因素之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14644-2.
7
THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL CONTEXT ON COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY ACROSS EUROPE: A MULTI-LEVEL APPROACH.国家背景对欧洲各地新冠疫苗犹豫情绪的影响:一种多层次方法
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 13:2025.08.11.25333435. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.11.25333435.
8
Socio-demographic correlates of health behaviors of children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间儿童和青少年健康行为的社会人口学相关因素:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10190-z.
9
European countries policy responses against SARS-Cov-2 in the context of vaccinations.欧洲国家在疫苗接种背景下针对新冠病毒的政策应对措施。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):30189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11881-3.
10
Korean and Chinese citizens' pandemic fatigue and related factors amidst the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for risk communication.长期新冠疫情下韩国和中国公民的疫情疲劳及相关因素:对风险沟通的启示
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0329262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329262. eCollection 2025.