Bigby Christine, Douglas Jacinta, Smith Elizabeth, Carney Terry, Then Shih-Ning, Wiesel Ilan
Living with Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Summer Foundation, Melbourne, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6356-6364. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1964623. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
A rights perspective proposes supported decision-making as an alternative to substitute decision-making. However, evidence about supported decision-making practice is limited. Our aim was to build evidence about building the capacity of decision supporters.
Eighteen parents of people with intellectual disabilities were trained in decision support using the La Trobe Support for Decision-making Practice Framework. Data from repeated semi-structured interviews and mentoring sessions were used to capture parental reflections on the value of training.
The training acted as a catalyst for parent self-reflection and the Framework prompted them to adopt a more deliberative approach to supporting decision-making. Some parents perceived increased confidence of their adult offspring in expressing preferences resulting from their own changed approach.
This study demonstrates the efficacy of this Framework and evidence-based training in building the capacity of parental decision supporters to be consistent with the rights paradigm. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe La Trobe Support for Decision-making Practice Framework is an evidence-based approach to decision support practice with an accompanying set of free online resources which can be used by individual practitioners or programs to inform their practice and build the capacity of supporters.Parents of adults with intellectual disabilities value training in the La Trobe Support for Decision-making Practice Framework, which they consider helps to develop their decision support skills and self-reflection.Parents also value individual mentoring following training to assist them to apply the principles of the practice framework to the everyday support for decision-making they provide to their adult son or daughter.Training in support practice should be accompanied by individual mentoring or other strategies to assist parents of adults with intellectual disabilities to discuss and solve the difficult issues they confront in providing decision support more aligned to the rights paradigm.
权利视角提出支持性决策作为替代替代性决策的一种选择。然而,关于支持性决策实践的证据有限。我们的目的是积累关于培养决策支持者能力的证据。
18名智障人士的家长接受了使用拉筹伯决策支持实践框架的决策支持培训。来自重复的半结构化访谈和指导课程的数据被用于捕捉家长对培训价值的反思。
培训成为家长自我反思的催化剂,该框架促使他们采用更具审议性的方法来支持决策。一些家长认为,由于他们自身方法的改变,其成年子女在表达偏好方面的信心有所增强。
本研究证明了该框架和基于证据的培训在培养家长决策支持者能力方面的有效性,使其符合权利范式。对康复的启示拉筹伯决策支持实践框架是一种基于证据的决策支持实践方法,同时还有一套免费的在线资源,可供个体从业者或项目使用,以指导他们的实践并培养支持者的能力。智障成年人士的家长重视拉筹伯决策支持实践框架的培训,他们认为这有助于培养他们的决策支持技能和自我反思能力。家长们还重视培训后的个人指导,以帮助他们将实践框架的原则应用到他们为成年子女提供的日常决策支持中。支持实践培训应辅以个人指导或其他策略,以帮助智障成年人士的家长讨论并解决他们在提供更符合权利范式的决策支持时所面临的难题。