Department of Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Hospital das Clinicas da FMRPUSP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Feb;95(2):319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) allows direct visualization of the biliary tree for evaluation of biliary strictures. Our objective was to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) of DSOC interpretation for indeterminate biliary strictures using newly refined criteria.
Fourteen endoscopists were asked to review an atlas of reference clips and images of 5 criteria derived from expert consensus. They then proceeded to score 50 deidentified DSOC video clips based on the visualization of tortuous and dilated vessels, irregular nodulations, raised intraductal lesions, irregular surface with or without ulcerations, and friability. The endoscopists then diagnosed the clips as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was done to evaluate inter-rater agreement for both criteria sets and final diagnosis.
Clips of 41 malignant lesions and 9 benign lesions were scored. Three of 5 revised criteria had almost perfect agreement. ICC was almost perfect for presence of tortuous and dilated vessels (.86), raised intraductal lesions (.90), and presence of friability (.83); substantial agreement for presence of irregular nodulations (.71); and moderate agreement for presence of irregular surface with or without ulcerations (.44). The diagnostic ICC was almost perfect for neoplastic (.90) and non-neoplastic (.90) diagnoses. The overall diagnostic accuracy using the revised criteria was 77%, ranging from 64% to 88%.
The IOA and accuracy rate of DSOC using the new Mendoza criteria shows a significant increase of 16% and 20% compared with previous criteria. The reference atlas helps with formal training and may improve diagnostic accuracy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02166099.).
数字单操作员胆管镜(DSOC)允许直接观察胆道以评估胆管狭窄。我们的目的是使用新的细化标准评估 DSOC 对不确定胆管狭窄的解释的观察者间一致性(IOA)。
14 名内镜医师被要求查看参考剪辑图集和 5 个源自专家共识的标准的图像。然后,他们根据迂曲和扩张的血管、不规则的小结节、隆起的腔内病变、不规则的表面有或没有溃疡以及易碎性,对 50 个匿名 DSOC 视频剪辑进行评分。然后,内镜医师将剪辑诊断为肿瘤性或非肿瘤性。进行组内相关(ICC)分析,以评估两个标准集和最终诊断的观察者间一致性。
评分了 41 个恶性病变和 9 个良性病变的剪辑。5 个修订标准中的 3 个具有几乎完美的一致性。ICC 几乎完美地评估了迂曲和扩张的血管的存在(.86)、隆起的腔内病变的存在(.90)和易碎性的存在(.83);不规则小结节的存在(.71)具有实质性一致性;存在不规则表面有或没有溃疡的情况(.44)具有中度一致性。新的 Mendoza 标准的肿瘤性(.90)和非肿瘤性(.90)诊断的诊断 ICC 几乎完美。使用修订标准的总体诊断准确性为 77%,范围为 64%至 88%。
与以前的标准相比,使用新的门多萨标准的 DSOC 的 IOA 和准确性提高了 16%和 20%。参考图谱有助于正式培训,并可能提高诊断准确性。(临床试验注册号:NCT02166099.)。