Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Department of Urology, Wythenshawe hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02902-6.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the use of the current best evidence for patient care. Medical students should critically appraise the research evidence to help them during their clinical practice in the future. We conducted this study to assess the skills, terms and attitude toward EBM.
We conducted a cross-sectional study for medical students from governmental universities. Students completed an online validated questionnaire consisting of several sections to assess skills, attitude and knowledge about terms related to EBM. We used a scale ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 5(strongly agree) for the 11 questions assessing the attitude and a scale ranging from 1(Poor) to 5(advanced) for EBM skills.
A total of 761 medical students with a mean age of 21.97 ± 1.64 participated in the study. 327 (43 %) of them were males. The most commonly used search engines were Google 690 (91 %) and Wikipedia 465 (61 %). Medical books 719 (94 %) and lecture notes 353 (46 %) were the most common sources for health information. The majority of students rated their skills related to EBM as average and below average for all questions (overall = 2.18 ± 0.8). Students rated their skills as poor (31 %) in locating professional literature, as average (34 %) in searching online databases, poor (42 %) in critical appraisal of a scientific publication reporting findings from clinical research and poor (36 %) in Critical appraisal of available scientific literature. Regarding attitude, the overall mean score was 2.83 ± 0.76. There is no significant difference in attitude score between students with or without EBM training (P = 0.2). The terms with the highest understanding were case-control study (45 %) and case report (44 %) for study design. Median (44 %) and sample size (43 %) for statistics. Incidence (46 %) and prevalence (44 %) for epidemiology.
Medical students have a knowledge gap in skills and terms related to EBM and an average attitude towards EBM. The majority of them were using a nonscientific search engine to obtain medical information. There is a need to educate students about the proper steps for getting the scientific literature and EBM skills.
循证医学(EBM)是利用当前最佳证据进行患者护理。医学生应批判性地评估研究证据,以帮助他们在未来的临床实践中。我们进行这项研究是为了评估技能、术语和对循证医学的态度。
我们对来自政府大学的医学生进行了横断面研究。学生完成了一份在线验证问卷,其中包括几个部分,以评估与循证医学相关的技能、态度和术语知识。我们使用 1 到 5 的量表来评估 11 个问题的态度,使用 1 到 5 的量表来评估 EBM 技能。
共有 761 名平均年龄为 21.97±1.64 岁的医学生参加了这项研究。其中 327 名(43%)为男性。最常用的搜索引擎是 Google(690 名,91%)和 Wikipedia(465 名,61%)。医书(719 名,94%)和讲座笔记(353 名,46%)是获取健康信息的最常见来源。大多数学生对他们在所有问题上的 EBM 相关技能评价为平均水平和低于平均水平(总体评分为 2.18±0.8)。学生在定位专业文献方面的技能评价为较差(31%),在搜索在线数据库方面的技能评价为平均(34%),在批判性评估报告临床研究结果的科学出版物方面的技能评价为较差(42%),在批判性评估现有科学文献方面的技能评价为较差(36%)。关于态度,总体平均得分为 2.83±0.76。有 EBM 培训和没有 EBM 培训的学生之间的态度评分没有显著差异(P=0.2)。对术语的理解最高的是病例对照研究(45%)和病例报告(44%)作为研究设计。统计学的中位数(44%)和样本量(43%)。流行病学的发病率(46%)和患病率(44%)。
医学生在与循证医学相关的技能和术语方面存在知识差距,对循证医学的态度平均。他们中的大多数人使用非科学的搜索引擎来获取医学信息。有必要教育学生获取科学文献和 EBM 技能的正确步骤。