Hasabo Elfatih A, Elnaiem Walaa, Ahmed Alaa S, Abdalla Azza E A, Ahmed Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed, Ahmed Ghassan Elfatih Mustafa, Abdelgader Mohamed Sati Shampool, Alfatih Alamin, Sherif Huda A, Al Komi Omar, Aldare Hajar Alkokhiya, Benmelouka Amira Yasmine, Jobran Afnan W M, Mugibel Tayba A, Al-Kassih Mohamad Imad, Alsaman Muhamad Zakaria Brimo, Aljabali Ahmed, Eljack Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah
Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Sudan Analytics Research Group, Khartoum, Sudan.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0329827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329827. eCollection 2025.
Systematic reviews (SR) provide the highest level of evidence in research. Medical students are encouraged to learn how to conduct SR, yet barriers to engaging in these reviews need to be identified to enhance their implementation. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, practices, and perceived barriers to conducting SR among undergraduate medical students from Arab countries.
A cross-sectional study was conducted involving undergraduate medical students from nine Arab countries enrolled in public and private medical schools. Sociodemographic information, as well as data on knowledge and barriers to conducting SR, were collected from participants through an online survey. The level of knowledge regarding SR was measured using a set of questions, with a total score of 19. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) were used to find the associated factors with good knowledge of SR.
With a response rate of 89.7%, 13,060 participants were enrolled, of whom 58.9% were female and 77.0% were studying at public universities. Additionally, 49.0% were in their clinical years. Approximately 31% had heard about SR, and 3,275 participants (25.1%) had attended training on SR. Overall, only 4.3% of participants demonstrated good knowledge of SRs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (AOR = 1.111, 95% CI: 1.069-1.154) and participation in research-related activities (AOR = 4.501, 95% CI: 3.650-5.551) were significantly associated with good knowledge of SR. The most identified barriers to conducting SRs included a lack of knowledge about SR (47.0%) and a lack of research exposure and opportunities (28.8%). Regarding engagement in secondary research, only 1,567 participants (12.0%) had participated in a secondary research project, and of those, only 471 (30.1%) had published their work. The types of enrolled research projects included SR (62.3%), systematic reviews with meta-analysis (43.3%), and network meta-analysis (33.4%).
The findings indicate a poor level of knowledge regarding SR among participants and highlight several barriers preventing undergraduate medical students from engaging in this research. There is a pressing need for further training on SR to enhance the knowledge and practice of SR among undergraduate medical students.
系统评价(SR)在研究中提供了最高级别的证据。鼓励医学生学习如何进行系统评价,但需要识别参与这些评价的障碍,以加强其实施。本研究旨在评估阿拉伯国家本科医学生在进行系统评价方面的知识、实践和感知障碍。
进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了来自9个阿拉伯国家公立和私立医学院校的本科医学生。通过在线调查从参与者那里收集社会人口学信息以及关于进行系统评价的知识和障碍的数据。使用一组问题来衡量关于系统评价的知识水平,总分19分。采用调整后的优势比(AOR)来找出与系统评价知识良好相关的因素。
回复率为89.7%,共纳入13060名参与者,其中58.9%为女性,77.0%在公立大学学习。此外,49.0%处于临床学习阶段。约31%听说过系统评价,3275名参与者(25.1%)参加过系统评价培训。总体而言,只有4.3%的参与者对系统评价有良好的了解。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄(AOR = 1.111,95%CI:1.069 - 1.154)和参与研究相关活动(AOR = 4.501,95%CI:3.650 - 5.551)与系统评价知识良好显著相关。进行系统评价最常被提及的障碍包括对系统评价缺乏了解(47.0%)以及缺乏研究接触和机会(28.8%)。关于参与二次研究,只有1567名参与者(12.0%)参与过二次研究项目,其中只有471名(30.1%)发表了他们的工作。纳入的研究项目类型包括系统评价(62.3%)、荟萃分析的系统评价(43.3%)和网状荟萃分析(33.4%)。
研究结果表明参与者对系统评价的知识水平较低,并突出了阻碍本科医学生参与此类研究的几个障碍。迫切需要进一步开展系统评价培训,以提高本科医学生在系统评价方面的知识和实践水平。