Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Med Phys. 2021 Nov;48(11):7333-7345. doi: 10.1002/mp.15209. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
This work presents the validation of an analytical pencil beam dose calculation algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for carbon ions by measurements of dose distributions in heterogeneous phantom geometries. Additionally, a comparison study of carbon ions versus protons is performed considering current best solutions in commercial TPS.
All treatment plans were optimized and calculated using the RayStation TPS (RaySearch, Sweden). The dose distributions calculated with the TPS were compared with measurements using a 24-pinpoint ionization chamber array (T31015, PTW, Germany). Tissue-like inhomogeneities (bone, lung, and soft tissue) were embedded in water, while a target volume of 4 x 4 x 4 cm was defined at two different depths behind the heterogeneities. In total, 10 different test cases, with and without range shifter as well as different air gaps, were investigated. Dose distributions inside as well as behind the target volume were evaluated.
Inside the target volume, the mean dose difference between calculations and measurements, averaged over all test cases, was 1.6% for carbon ions. This compares well to the final agreement of 1.5% obtained in water at the commissioning stage of the TPS for carbon ions and is also within the clinically acceptable interval of 3%. The mean dose difference and maximal dose difference obtained outside the target area were 1.8% and 13.4%, respectively. The agreement of dose distributions for carbon ions in the target volumes was comparable or better to that between Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations and measurements for protons. Percentage dose differences of more than 10% were present outside the target area behind bone-lung structures, where the carbon ion calculations systematically over predicted the dose. MC dose calculations for protons were superior to carbon ion beams outside the target volumes.
The pencil beam dose calculations for carbon ions in RayStation were found to be in good agreement with dosimetric measurements in heterogeneous geometries for points of interest located within the target. Large local discrepancies behind the target may contribute to incorrect dose predictions for organs at risk.
本研究通过测量不均匀体模中的剂量分布,验证了一种商业治疗计划系统(TPS)中用于碳离子的分析笔束剂量计算算法的准确性。此外,还针对当前商业 TPS 中的最佳解决方案,对碳离子与质子进行了比较研究。
所有治疗计划均使用 RayStation TPS(RaySearch,瑞典)进行优化和计算。TPS 计算的剂量分布与使用 24 针电离室阵列(T31015,PTW,德国)进行的测量进行了比较。将类似组织的不均匀性(骨、肺和软组织)嵌入水中,同时在不均匀体模后面的两个不同深度定义了 4×4×4 cm 的靶区。总共研究了 10 种不同的测试情况,包括有无射程位移器以及不同的气隙。评估了靶区内部和后面的剂量分布。
在靶区内部,所有测试情况的平均剂量差异为 1.6%,对于碳离子来说,这与 TPS 在碳离子调试阶段获得的最终一致性为 1.5%相当,也在临床可接受的 3%范围内。在靶区外部获得的平均剂量差异和最大剂量差异分别为 1.8%和 13.4%。碳离子在靶区内部的剂量分布一致性与质子的 MC 剂量计算和测量相当或更好。在骨-肺结构后面的靶区外部,存在超过 10%的剂量差异,碳离子计算系统地高估了剂量。质子的 MC 剂量计算在靶区外部优于碳离子束。
在 RayStation 中,对于位于靶区内的感兴趣点,碳离子的笔束剂量计算与不均匀体模中的剂量测量结果吻合良好。在靶区后面的大局部差异可能导致对危险器官的不正确剂量预测。