Munro-Kramer Michelle L, Skidmore Lauren M, Cannon Lindsay M, Huhman Anne K, Carter Shareia N, Williamsen Kaaren M, Ngo Quyen M
University of Michigan, MI, USA.
University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP19522-NP19548. doi: 10.1177/08862605211042816. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem among college students and many students have difficulty identifying unhealthy and abusive behaviors. The aims of this mixed methods study are to: (a) create an inclusive tool that illustrates the power and control experiences of a diverse group of young adult college students, (b) ensure a broad scope of tactics are illustrated (related to technology and different types of relationships), and (c) measure the experience of these tactics, including how IPV knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy are influenced by a more inclusive tool. In Phase I, semi-structured interviews were conducted with students (n = 33) and staff (n = 10) at campus sexual assault centers at the three University of Michigan (UM) campuses to explore power and control tactics utilized by perpetrators on college campuses. Content analysis revealed 13 categories of tactics in college relationships. A draft tool was created and assessed for accuracy using cognitive interviews with students (n = 20) from all three campuses in Phase II. Cognitive interviews resulted in the following changes to the final tool: (a) new presentation of the Socioecological Model, (b) identification of substance use as a facilitator for multiple forms of violence, and (c) edits to tactic descriptions. In Phase III, 250 students at UM-Ann Arbor participated in a quasi-experimental evaluation in which 133 interacted with the tool and 117 received access to usual care (campus sexual misconduct policy). Both groups answered survey questions about IPV knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and experiences at baseline, and after one month and five months. Among all college participants in Phase III, 33.5% had experienced lifetime IPV and 25.2% had experienced IPV in the past year. There were no significant differences among IPV knowledge, attitudes, or self-efficacy by group. The Dynamics of Interpersonal Coercion Among College Students tool was created by incorporating current tactics utilized among a diverse college population.
亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）是大学生群体中一个严重的公共卫生问题，许多学生难以识别不健康和虐待行为。这项混合方法研究的目的是：（a）创建一个包容性工具，用以说明不同类型的年轻成年大学生的权力和控制经历；（b）确保展示广泛的策略（与技术和不同类型的关系相关）；（c）衡量这些策略的体验，包括更具包容性的工具如何影响IPV知识、态度和自我效能。在第一阶段，对密歇根大学（UM）三个校区的校园性侵犯中心的学生（n = 33）和工作人员（n = 10）进行了半结构化访谈，以探讨校园内施暴者所使用的权力和控制策略。内容分析揭示了大学关系中的13类策略。在第二阶段，创建了一个工具草案，并通过对来自所有三个校区的学生（n = 20）进行认知访谈来评估其准确性。认知访谈导致对最终工具做出以下修改：（a）社会生态模型的新呈现方式；（b）将物质使用确定为多种形式暴力的促成因素；（c）对策略描述进行编辑。在第三阶段，密歇根大学安娜堡分校的250名学生参与了一项准实验评估，其中133人与该工具进行了互动，117人获得了常规护理（校园性行为不端政策）。两组在基线、一个月和五个月后都回答了关于IPV知识、态度、自我效能和经历的调查问题。在第三阶段的所有大学参与者中，33.5%的人曾经历过终生IPV，25.2%的人在过去一年中经历过IPV。两组在IPV知识、态度或自我效能方面没有显著差异。《大学生人际胁迫动态》工具是通过纳入不同大学生群体中使用的当前策略而创建的。
