Radiographic Templating for Calcaneus Operative Fixation: How Similar Is Side-to-Side Comparison?

OBJECTIVES

Calcaneal fractures often require contralateral, uninjured calcaneus radiographs as a template. The purpose of this study was to establish mean values for calcaneal radiographic parameters in an uninjured urban American population and perform side-by-side comparison with respect to age, sex, laterality, and radiograph obliquity (XRO).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients.

SETTING

Fourteen hospitals including Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of >800 uninjured patients with bilateral foot and calcaneus radiographs obtained between June and December 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria were the following: age 18-89 years without fracture; previous foot surgical procedures; radiographic evidence of arthrosis in ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot; osteomyelitis; tumor; or foot deformities.

INTERVENTION

The lateral radiographs were independently reviewed by 3 observers, measuring Böhler angle (BA), crucial angle of Gissane (CAG), calcaneal length (CL), calcaneal height (CH), calcaneotalar ratio (CTR), and XRO.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The mean values of BA, CAG, CL, CH, and CTR were established. Side-by-side comparisons were completed with respect to age, sex, laterality, and XRO.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in side-by-side measurements of the BA, CAG, CL, or CH. XRO had significant effects on the measurements of BA, CAG, CH, and CTR. Side-by-side comparisons showed greater intersubject variability than within-subject differences.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe any differences in commonly measured calcaneal radiographic parameters. CAG is not a reliable parameter for diagnostic and operative planning purposes. We conclude that the use of contralateral calcaneus radiographs as templates for calcaneus fractures is a valid technique.