• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee.弗雷泽分类法与布雷克和麦克布赖德分类法对浮动膝的观察者间一致性评估
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):459-462. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713388. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
The Floating Knee Injuries: Does it Need a New Classification System?漂浮膝损伤:是否需要一个新的分类系统?
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Nov 3;55(2):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00298-x. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
Floating Knee浮动膝
4
Functional outcomes and quality of life in adult ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures.成人同侧股骨和胫骨骨折的功能结局与生活质量
J Orthop Translat. 2018 Sep 5;16:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.002. eCollection 2019 Jan.
5
The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures.浮动膝:同侧股骨和胫骨骨折的综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(11):375-382. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000042. eCollection 2016 Nov.
6
Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.与其他骨折分类系统相比,胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性是否更低?:以股骨近端转子区骨折作为对比模型的比较研究
Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures.肱骨近端骨折的Neer和AO分类的观察者间一致性。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):280-4. doi: 10.1111/ans.13451. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Surgical treatment of type II floating knee: comparisons of the results of type IIA and type IIB floating knee.II型浮动膝的手术治疗:IIA型和IIB型浮动膝治疗结果的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 May;15(5):578-86. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0252-1. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
9
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.两种跟骨关节内骨折分类系统的观察者间及观察者内可靠性
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Apr;27(4):251-5. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700405.
10
ASSESSMENT OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE OUTERBRIDGE AND FSA CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CHONDRAL LESIONS OF THE KNEE.膝关节软骨损伤的Outerbridge和FSA分类的可重复性评估。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Dec 8;46(3):266-9. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30193-2. eCollection 2011 May-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional outcomes and quality of life in adult ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures.成人同侧股骨和胫骨骨折的功能结局与生活质量
J Orthop Translat. 2018 Sep 5;16:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.002. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures.浮动膝:同侧股骨和胫骨骨折的综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(11):375-382. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000042. eCollection 2016 Nov.
3
ANALYSIS OF THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES' CLASSIFICATION.胫骨平台骨折分类的可重复性分析
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;44(3):225-9. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30072-0. eCollection 2009 Jan.
4
Traumatic Floating Knee: A Review of a Multi-Centric Series of 172 Cases in Adult.创伤性浮动膝:172例成人多中心系列病例回顾
Open Orthop J. 2015 Jul 31;Suppl 1 M11:356-60. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010356. eCollection 2015.
5
Management of the Floating Knee in Polytrauma Patients.多发伤患者中浮动膝的处理
Open Orthop J. 2015 Jul 31;9:347-55. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010347. eCollection 2015.
6
Floating knee injury associated with patellar tendon rupture: a case report and review of literature.伴有髌腱断裂的浮膝损伤:一例病例报告及文献复习
Case Rep Orthop. 2012;2012:913230. doi: 10.1155/2012/913230. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Surgical management of ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia in adults (the floating knee): postoperative clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes.成人同侧股骨和胫骨骨折(浮动膝)的手术治疗:术后临床、影像学和功能结果。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):133-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.2.133. Epub 2011 May 12.
8
Surgical treatment of type II floating knee: comparisons of the results of type IIA and type IIB floating knee.II型浮动膝的手术治疗:IIA型和IIB型浮动膝治疗结果的比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 May;15(5):578-86. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0252-1. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
9
The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.用于肱骨近端骨折的Neer分类系统。观察者间可靠性和观察者内可重复性的评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Dec;75(12):1745-50. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00002.
10
Fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia: emphasis on intra-articular and soft tissue injury.同侧股骨和胫骨骨折:重点关注关节内和软组织损伤。
J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(3):309-14. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199004030-00013.

弗雷泽分类法与布雷克和麦克布赖德分类法对浮动膝的观察者间一致性评估

Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee.

作者信息

Alencar Neto Jonatas Brito, Osório Neto Ernane Bruno, Souza Clodoaldo José Duarte de, da Rocha Pedro Henrique Messias, Cavalcante Maria Luzete Costa, Lopes Márcio Bezerra Gadelha

机构信息

Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Instituto Doutor José Frota, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.

Curso de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug;56(4):459-462. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713388. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1713388
PMID:34483389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8405262/
Abstract

To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde.  Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient  When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryde rating. Among the 10 R3, the agreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63 for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of trauma and orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification.  Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians.

摘要

为评估两种浮膝分类方法(弗雷泽分类法和布莱克与麦克布赖德分类法)的观察者间一致性。32名观察者,根据经验程度进行细分(26名住院医师和6名骨科创伤专科骨科医生),对15例同侧股骨和胫骨骨折进行分类。采用Kappa系数评估观察者间一致性。在评估9名R1时,弗雷泽分类法的Kappa指数为0.58,布莱克与麦克布赖德分类法的Kappa指数为0.46。在7名R2中,弗雷泽分级的比率为0.59,布莱克与麦克布赖德分级的比率为0.51。在10名R3中,两种分类法的一致性指数均较高:弗雷泽分类法为0.72,布莱克与麦克布赖德分类法为0.71。将3组(R1、R2、R3)视为一个大组,计算总体Kappa指数,结果弗雷泽分类法为0.63,布莱克与麦克布赖德分类法为0.56。在创伤和骨科膝关节专科医生组中,布莱克与麦克布赖德分类法的一致性为0.597,弗雷泽分类法的一致性为0.843。相比之下,两种分类法的一致性程度为弱到中度。弗雷泽分类法在两组中具有更好的一致性。评估骨科创伤医生时一致性更高。