• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

闭合式拔牙法中手臂力量与手臂力量加手腕运动效率的比较:一项观察性研究

Comparison of the efficiency of arm force versus arm force plus wrist movement in closed method extractions an observational study.

作者信息

Sundaram Prashanth, Kandasamy Saravanan, John Reena Rachel, Sri K C Keerthana

机构信息

Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, Deemed to be University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May-Aug;12(2):250-254. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_212_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

DOI:10.4103/njms.NJMS_212_20
PMID:34483585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8386269/
Abstract

BACKGOUND

Atraumatic dental extraction preserves not only the bone, but also maintains the gingival architecture, hence allows immediate or late dental implant placement. The incidence of fracture of roots and buccal cortical plates increases when wrong force is used. Currently, there is insufficient literature evidence with regard to the appropriate method for application of arm and wrist force at the time of dental extraction.

AIM

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the efficiency of arm force only versus arm force plus wrist movement during closed extractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients who underwent extractions of right upper molars ( = 50) in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department were selected for the study after obtaining Informed Consent. The patients with grossly decayed broken teeth and mobile teeth were excluded. The procedure was carried out by interns and was observed by three maxillofacial surgeons of more than 5 years of experience independently.

RESULTS

It was observed that 30% of the trainees used arm only force during dental extraction and were unaware about it. The time taken for tooth removal in the group which used arm and wrist force was significantly lesser ( < 0.001). It was also observed that the breakage of tooth and alveolar bone fracture was more common with the group who used only arm force.

CONCLUSION

From the results of the present study, it can be concluded that during exodontia procedures, the principle of using arm and wrist facilitates safe and easy removal of tooth with less time.

摘要

背景

无创拔牙不仅能保留牙槽骨,还能维持牙龈结构,从而允许即刻或延期植入牙种植体。使用不当力量时,牙根和颊侧皮质骨板骨折的发生率会增加。目前,关于拔牙时手臂和手腕力量的适当应用方法,文献证据不足。

目的

因此,本研究的目的是比较在闭合性拔牙过程中仅使用手臂力量与手臂力量加手腕运动的效率。

材料与方法

在获得知情同意后,选择口腔颌面外科拔除右上磨牙的患者(n = 50)进行研究。排除有严重龋坏折断牙和松动牙的患者。该操作由实习生进行,由三位经验超过5年的颌面外科医生独立观察。

结果

观察到30%的实习生在拔牙时仅使用手臂力量,且对此并不知晓。使用手臂和手腕力量的组拔牙所需时间明显更短(P < 0.001)。还观察到,仅使用手臂力量的组牙齿折断和牙槽骨骨折更为常见。

结论

从本研究结果可以得出结论,在拔牙过程中,使用手臂和手腕的方法有助于安全、轻松地拔牙,且用时更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/020538697b0e/NJMS-12-250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/35827235c380/NJMS-12-250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/d1cc2a74de40/NJMS-12-250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/c35e443284d2/NJMS-12-250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/d18cf31fbffc/NJMS-12-250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/020538697b0e/NJMS-12-250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/35827235c380/NJMS-12-250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/d1cc2a74de40/NJMS-12-250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/c35e443284d2/NJMS-12-250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/d18cf31fbffc/NJMS-12-250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0607/8386269/020538697b0e/NJMS-12-250-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficiency of arm force versus arm force plus wrist movement in closed method extractions an observational study.闭合式拔牙法中手臂力量与手臂力量加手腕运动效率的比较:一项观察性研究
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May-Aug;12(2):250-254. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_212_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Comparison Between Physics and Conventional Forceps in Simple Dental Extraction.简单牙拔除术中物理方法与传统拔牙钳的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0765-6. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forcep and conventional forceps for extraction of maxillary molars.物理拔牙钳与传统拔牙钳拔除上颌磨牙疗效的比较评估
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2024 Apr;73(2):75-80. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations.即刻和延迟临时单颗牙修复体的前瞻性评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11 Suppl):89-107. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.009.
5
Minimally Invasive Extraction System Benex-Clinical Evaluation and Comparison.微创拔牙系统Benex-临床评估与比较
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):234. doi: 10.3390/dj12080234.
6
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
7
Alveolar bone remodeling around immediate implants placed in accordance with the extraction socket classification: a three-dimensional microcomputed tomography analysis.根据拔牙窝分类即刻植入物周围牙槽骨改建的三维显微 CT 分析。
J Periodontol. 2012 Aug;83(8):981-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110569. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
8
A survey of antibiotic prescribing by maxillofacial consultants for dental extractions following radiotherapy to the oral cavity.一项关于口腔放疗后颌面外科顾问医生针对拔牙开具抗生素情况的调查。
Br Dent J. 2002 Feb 9;192(3):157-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801322.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.下颌智齿拔除的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
Experimental study on strength evaluation applied for teeth extraction: an in vivo study.牙齿拔除强度评估的实验研究:一项体内研究。
Open Dent J. 2013;7:20-6. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010020. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
3
Atraumatic vertical tooth extraction: a proof of principle clinical study of a novel system.
微创垂直拔牙:一种新型系统的原理临床研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Nov;116(5):e303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.037. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Technological advances in extraction techniques and outpatient oral surgery.拔牙技术与门诊口腔外科手术的技术进展。
Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jul;55(3):501-13, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
5
Atraumatic extractions: a biomechanical rationale.无创拔牙:生物力学原理
Dent Today. 2008 Aug;27(8):98, 100-1.
6
Er:YAG laser osteotomy for removal of impacted teeth: clinical comparison of two techniques.铒激光截骨术拔除阻生牙:两种技术的临床比较
Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Aug;39(7):583-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20528.
7
Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management.拔牙窝缺损的评估、分类及处理
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005 Nov;33(11):853-63.
8
Intraoral piezosurgery: preliminary results of a new technique.口内压电手术:一种新技术的初步结果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9):1283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.304.
9
Some early dental extraction instruments including the pelican, bird or axe?一些早期的拔牙器械,包括鹈鹕形、鸟形或斧形的?
Aust Dent J. 2002 Jun;47(2):90-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00310.x.