• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创拔牙系统Benex-临床评估与比较

Minimally Invasive Extraction System Benex-Clinical Evaluation and Comparison.

作者信息

Chenchev Lyubomir, Ivanova Vasilena, Giragosyan Krikor, Gavrailov Tasho, Chenchev Ivan

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Center of Dental Implantology, Research Institute, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):234. doi: 10.3390/dj12080234.

DOI:10.3390/dj12080234
PMID:39195078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11352974/
Abstract

Tooth extraction is one of the oldest and most well-known surgical procedures in dental medicine. It is still routinely performed by general practitioners and dental undergraduates. The Benex extraction system allows for the extraction of teeth in a vertical direction, which avoids most trauma against surrounding alveolar bone and soft tissues. The study included 56 patients who were recruited from the Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University-Plovdiv. The patients were split into two groups of 28 patients-Group I (control group) and Group II (study group). For each group, the success of the extraction, buccal cortical plate preservation, pain experience and early wound healing were assessed. There was no statistical significance between the success of the extractions in both groups. The Benex extractions preserved the buccal cortical plate in 95% of the cases, whereas the forceps extractions preserved it in only 71.8%, which is statistically significant. On the seventh day, patients in Group II reported less pain, without a significant difference. There was a significantly bigger number of completely healed extraction wounds on the 10th day. Atraumatic extractions allow for more hard and soft tissues to be preserved in the extraction site. This is essential for a successful outcome and the aesthetically pleasing results of the following dental restoration.

摘要

拔牙是牙医学中最古老且最广为人知的外科手术之一。全科医生和牙科本科生仍经常进行此项操作。贝内克斯拔牙系统能够垂直方向拔牙,这避免了对周围牙槽骨和软组织的大部分创伤。该研究纳入了56名从普罗夫迪夫医科大学口腔外科招募的患者。患者被分为两组,每组28名患者——第一组(对照组)和第二组(研究组)。对每组患者的拔牙成功率、颊侧皮质骨板保留情况、疼痛体验和早期伤口愈合情况进行了评估。两组拔牙成功率之间无统计学意义。贝内克斯拔牙法在95%的病例中保留了颊侧皮质骨板,而钳拔法仅在71.8%的病例中保留了该骨板,这具有统计学意义。在第七天,第二组患者报告的疼痛较轻,但差异不显著。在第十天,完全愈合的拔牙伤口数量明显更多。无创拔牙能够在拔牙部位保留更多的软硬组织。这对于成功的治疗结果以及后续牙齿修复的美观效果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/576c26825c5b/dentistry-12-00234-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/03adcfab09d1/dentistry-12-00234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/0c8939137857/dentistry-12-00234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/4094a21147a1/dentistry-12-00234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/036393af27e3/dentistry-12-00234-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/576c26825c5b/dentistry-12-00234-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/03adcfab09d1/dentistry-12-00234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/0c8939137857/dentistry-12-00234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/4094a21147a1/dentistry-12-00234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/036393af27e3/dentistry-12-00234-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25b2/11352974/576c26825c5b/dentistry-12-00234-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Extraction System Benex-Clinical Evaluation and Comparison.微创拔牙系统Benex-临床评估与比较
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;12(8):234. doi: 10.3390/dj12080234.
2
Evaluation of post-extraction healing after atraumatic axial tooth extraction using Benex system II versus conventional extraction: Randomized control trial.使用贝内克斯系统II与传统拔牙方法进行无创伤轴向牙齿拔除后拔牙创愈合情况的评估:随机对照试验。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Comparison Between Physics and Conventional Forceps in Simple Dental Extraction.简单牙拔除术中物理方法与传统拔牙钳的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0765-6. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
5
Use of Physics Forceps in Atraumatic Orthodontic Extractions of Bilateral Premolars: A Randomized Control Clinical Study.物理镊子在双侧前磨牙无创伤正畸拔牙中的应用:一项随机对照临床研究。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Sep;19(3):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01347-6. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Evaluation and Comparison of Physics Forceps and Conventional Forceps in Bilateral Dental Extraction: A Randomized, Split-Mouth, Clinical Study.双侧牙拔除术中物理镊与传统镊的评估与比较:一项随机、分口、临床研究
Cureus. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):e38206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38206. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Extraction force and its determinants for minimally invasive vertical tooth extraction.微创垂直牙拔除术的拔牙力及其影响因素
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 May;105:103711. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103711. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
[A novel technique to preserve the alveolar ridge width following tooth extraction in the maxillary frontal area].[一种在上颌前部区域牙齿拔除后保留牙槽嵴宽度的新技术]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Feb 18;48(1):175-9.
9
[Applicational evaluation of split tooth extractions of upper molars using piezosurgery].[压电手术在上颌磨牙劈裂牙拔除术中的应用评价]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Aug 18;48(4):709-713.
10
Minimally invasive extractions with physics forceps - clinical evaluation and comparison.微创拔牙钳在临床中的评估与比较。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2024 Apr 30;66(2):235-242. doi: 10.3897/folmed.66.e122678.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-rooted extraction socket classification: A systematic review and proposal of a new classification system based on morphologic and patient-related factors.单根牙拔牙窝分类:基于形态学和患者相关因素的系统评价及新分类系统的提议
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):168-182. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12967. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
2
[Influencing Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Tooth Extraction].[影响拔牙后软硬组织变化]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2022;111(3):163-167. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003798.
3
A Retrospective Digital Analysis of Contour Changing after Tooth Extraction with or without Using Less Traumatic Surgical Procedures.
拔牙时使用或不使用微创外科手术的轮廓变化的回顾性数字分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 10;11(4):922. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040922.
4
Evaluation of post-extraction healing after atraumatic axial tooth extraction using Benex system II versus conventional extraction: Randomized control trial.使用贝内克斯系统II与传统拔牙方法进行无创伤轴向牙齿拔除后拔牙创愈合情况的评估:随机对照试验。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Principles of Exodontia.拔牙学原理
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;32(4):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Assessment of healing following low-level laser irradiation after gingivectomy operations using a novel soft tissue healing index: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical pilot study.使用新型软组织愈合指数评估牙龈切除术后低强度激光照射后的愈合情况:一项随机、双盲、半口对照临床试验研究
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;23(1):53-57. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_226_18.
7
Surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system: A clinical study.外科挤压与无创伤拔牙系统:一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):879-885. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Minimally invasive vertical versus conventional tooth extraction: An interrupted time series study.微创垂直拔牙与传统拔牙的比较:一项中断时间序列研究。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Aug;149(8):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Physics Forceps versus Conventional Forceps in Orthodontic Extractions: A Prospective Randomized Split Mouth Study.正畸拔牙中物理镊子与传统镊子疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机双颌研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC41-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17724.8160. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial.拔牙后不同牙槽嵴保存技术的唇侧软组织体积评估:一项随机对照临床试验
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):612-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12246. Epub 2014 Mar 26.