Suppr超能文献

不同的耐力运动方式,不同的情感反应:一项受试者内研究。

Different Endurance Exercise Modalities, Different Affective Response: A Within-Subject Study.

作者信息

Dierkes Katja, Mattioni Maturana Felipe, Rösel Inka, Martus Peter, Nieß Andreas M, Thiel Ansgar, Sudeck Gorden

机构信息

Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Institute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Interfaculty Research Institute for Sport and Physical Activity, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:686661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686661. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Affect experienced during an exercise session is supposed to predict future exercise behavior. However, empirical evidence reveals high variability in affective response to different exercise modalities. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare acute affective response and its variation during three different endurance exercise modalities: (a) moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE), (b) vigorous-intensity continuous exercise (VICE), and (c) high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). Using the dual-mode theory as a theoretical framework, cognitive and interoceptive factors were considered as potential predictors of in-task affective response. In a within-subject design, 40 insufficiently active healthy participants (aged from 20 to 40 years) attended three sessions per exercise modality on a cycle ergometer. Affective valence (measured by the Feeling Scale), two cognitive factors (perceived competence and awareness of interoceptive cues), and one interoceptive factor (heart rate) were assessed before, during, and after each exercise session. Mixed models with three levels (, and ) revealed more positive affective valence during MICE compared with VICE ( < 0.001) and HIIE ( < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between the latter two. Levene's test results showed the highest variability of in-task affective valence during VICE (s < 0.01). Regarding the course across the session, MICE was associated with a constant slight increase in affective valence from pre- to post-exercise ( < 0.05), whereas VICE and HIIE caused a decline in pleasure, followed by an affective rebound immediately after exercise termination (s < 0.01). The highest importance of cognitive and interoceptive factors for in-task affective valence was observed in VICE (s < 0.05). The current findings provide support for the tenets of the dual-mode theory, however, indicating that there may be differences in the affect-intensity relationship between continuous and interval exercise. In conclusion, the study results concerning previously insufficiently active individuals extend the knowledge of how exercise can positively shape affective well-being depending on exercise modality and psychophysiological influences. This knowledge enables public health practitioners to design more individualized activity recommendations, thereby improving the subjective experience of exercise.

摘要

运动过程中所体验到的情感被认为能够预测未来的运动行为。然而,实证证据显示,对不同运动方式的情感反应存在很大差异。因此,本研究的目的是比较三种不同耐力运动方式下的急性情感反应及其变化:(a)中等强度持续运动(MICE),(b)高强度持续运动(VICE),以及(c)高强度间歇运动(HIIE)。以双模式理论作为理论框架,认知因素和内感受因素被视为任务中情感反应的潜在预测指标。在一项被试内设计中,40名运动不足的健康参与者(年龄在20至40岁之间)在功率自行车上针对每种运动方式各参加了三个时段的运动。在每个运动时段之前、期间和之后,对情感效价(通过情感量表测量)、两个认知因素(感知能力和内感受线索的意识)以及一个内感受因素(心率)进行了评估。具有三个水平(、和)的混合模型显示,与VICE(<0.001)和HIIE(<0.01)相比,MICE期间的情感效价更为积极,而后两者之间没有显著差异。Levene检验结果显示,VICE期间任务中情感效价的变异性最高(s<0.01)。关于整个时段的变化过程,MICE与运动前到运动后情感效价持续轻微增加相关(<0.05),而VICE和HIIE则导致愉悦感下降,随后在运动结束后立即出现情感反弹(s<0.01)。在VICE中观察到认知因素和内感受因素对任务中情感效价的影响最为显著(s<0.05)。当前的研究结果为双模式理论的原则提供了支持,然而,这表明连续运动和间歇运动在情感强度关系上可能存在差异。总之,关于之前运动不足个体的研究结果扩展了我们对运动如何根据运动方式和心理生理影响积极塑造情感幸福感的认识。这些知识使公共卫生从业者能够设计更个性化的活动建议,从而改善运动的主观体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e0/8411706/311944312b98/fpsyg-12-686661-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验