• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机、社会情感与人工智能虚拟助手的接受度——基于信任的中介作用

Motivation, Social Emotion, and the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistants-Trust-Based Mediating Effects.

作者信息

Zhang Shiying, Meng Zixuan, Chen Beibei, Yang Xiu, Zhao Xinran

机构信息

Business and Economic Research Institute, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.

School of Business, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:728495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728495. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728495
PMID:34484086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8414898/
Abstract

The complexity of the emotional presentation of users to Artificial Intelligence (AI) virtual assistants is mainly manifested in user motivation and social emotion, but the current research lacks an effective conversion path from emotion to acceptance. This paper innovatively cuts from the perspective of trust, establishes an AI virtual assistant acceptance model, conducts an empirical study based on the survey data from 240 questionnaires, and uses multilevel regression analysis and the bootstrap method to analyze the data. The results showed that functionality and social emotions had a significant effect on trust, where perceived humanity showed an inverted U relationship on trust, and trust mediated the relationship between both functionality and social emotions and acceptance. The findings explain the emotional complexity of users toward AI virtual assistants and extend the transformation path of technology acceptance from the trust perspective, which has implications for the development and design of AI applications.

摘要

用户对人工智能(AI)虚拟助手的情感呈现复杂性主要体现在用户动机和社会情感方面,但目前的研究缺乏从情感到接受的有效转化路径。本文创新性地从信任角度切入,建立了AI虚拟助手接受模型,基于240份问卷的调查数据进行实证研究,并运用多层回归分析和Bootstrap方法对数据进行分析。结果表明,功能和社会情感对信任有显著影响,其中感知人性与信任呈倒U型关系,信任在功能和社会情感与接受之间起中介作用。研究结果解释了用户对AI虚拟助手的情感复杂性,并从信任角度扩展了技术接受的转化路径,对AI应用的开发和设计具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f3b/8414898/5e1bfb7af682/fpsyg-12-728495-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f3b/8414898/bfac6f266c43/fpsyg-12-728495-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f3b/8414898/5e1bfb7af682/fpsyg-12-728495-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f3b/8414898/bfac6f266c43/fpsyg-12-728495-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f3b/8414898/5e1bfb7af682/fpsyg-12-728495-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Motivation, Social Emotion, and the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistants-Trust-Based Mediating Effects.动机、社会情感与人工智能虚拟助手的接受度——基于信任的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:728495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728495. eCollection 2021.
2
Erratum: Motivation, Social Emotion, and the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistants-Trust-Based Mediating Effects.勘误:动机、社会情感与人工智能虚拟助手的接受度——基于信任的中介效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 26;12:790448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790448. eCollection 2021.
3
Application and extension of the UTAUT2 model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants.UTAUT2模型在确定人工智能虚拟助手使用行为意向因素方面的应用与拓展
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:993935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993935. eCollection 2022.
4
Analyzing the determinants to accept a virtual assistant and use cases among cancer patients: a mixed methods study.分析癌症患者接受虚拟助手的决定因素和用例:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08189-7.
5
Trust in and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine: Mixed Methods Study.对人工智能在医学中的应用的信任和接受:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 17;11:e47031. doi: 10.2196/47031.
6
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Virtual Assistants for Leukemia Self-Management.影响采用人工智能虚拟助手进行白血病自我管理的因素。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49724. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
First impressions of a financial AI assistant: differences between high trust and low trust users.金融人工智能助手的第一印象:高信任度用户与低信任度用户之间的差异。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 3;6:1241290. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1241290. eCollection 2023.
8
Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Transparency and Employees' Trust: The Parallel Multiple Mediating Effect of Effectiveness and Discomfort.人工智能决策透明度与员工信任:有效性与不适感的平行多重中介效应
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):127. doi: 10.3390/bs12050127.
9
Modeling the influence of attitudes, trust, and beliefs on endoscopists' acceptance of artificial intelligence applications in medical practice.模拟态度、信任和信念对内镜医师在医疗实践中接受人工智能应用的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1301563. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1301563. eCollection 2023.
10
The Drivers of Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Care Pathways Among Medical Professionals: Web-Based Survey Study.医疗专业人员对人工智能驱动的护理路径的接受度驱动因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e33368. doi: 10.2196/33368.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the factors influencing users' adoption of artificial intelligence health assistants based on an extended UTAUT model.基于扩展的UTAUT模型探究影响用户采用人工智能健康助手的因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01897-0.
2
Profiling public perception of emerging technologies: Gene editing, brain chips and exoskeletons. A data-analytics framework.剖析公众对新兴技术的认知:基因编辑、脑芯片和外骨骼。一种数据分析框架。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 8;10(22):e40268. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40268. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
3
Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds.通过推理式再现建立社会联系:小工具、神灵和灵缇犬中的孤独感与感知能动性
Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):114-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x.
从智能教育视角探索影响高等教育中ChatGPT接受度的因素
Heliyon. 2024 May 25;10(11):e31887. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
4
Behavioral intention of mental health practitioners toward the adoption of virtual humans in affect recognition training.心理健康从业者在情感识别训练中采用虚拟人的行为意向。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:934880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934880. eCollection 2022.