Zhang Qing, Wu Yi, Song Yilin, Qin Guanghao, Yang Lanting, Talwar Sumeet Singh, Lin Tiezhu, Talwar Gagan Deep Singh, Zhang Hongda, Xu Ling, Moore Jonathan E, Pazo Emmanuel Eric, He Wei
He Eye Specialist Hospital, No. 128 North Huanghe Street, Shenyang, China.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 24;2021:8396503. doi: 10.1155/2021/8396503. eCollection 2021.
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial and one of the most common problems treated in an ophthalmic outpatient clinic. Due to the variability in presentation, diagnosis of DED consists of a combination of subjective and objective clinical tests. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a handheld smartphone-based infrared thermal (IRT) camera for screening symptomatic evaporative DED.
This observational sex-matched control study assessed IRT images of 184 right eyes (46 normal and 138 DED) of 184 participants. Evaporative DED was assessed using noninvasive tear breakup time, fluorescein staining, and the Chinese version of the ocular surface disease index (C-OSDI) questionnaire and categorized into their respective dry eye symptomology group (none, mild, moderate, or severe). The ocular surface temperature (OST) at 8 anatomical regions of interest (ROI) (nasal conjunctiva, nasal limbus, nasal cornea, central cornea, inferior cornea, temporal limbus, temporal cornea, and temporal conjunctiva) were measured and compared using a handheld smartphone-based IRT camera. The effectiveness of these 8 ROIs OST in detecting varying severity of DED was evaluated in terms of correlations with severity of DED and their area under the curve (AUC).
OST at the 8 anatomical ROI was significantly higher in DED participants than in the non-DED group ( < 0.05) except for inferior cornea, temporal limbus, and temporal conjunctival regions (>0.05). Analyzing 8 anatomical ROIs revealed that the nasal limbus had the highest Pearson correlation with the severity of DED (0.64, < 0.001). Additionally, the nasal limbus ROI achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 (CI: 0.73-0.85; < 0.05), sensitivity, and specificity (0.96 and 0.91) when comparing its ability to discriminated DED vs. non-DED eyes.
Rather than a diagnostic tool, handheld smartphone-based IRT images can be considered as a rapid, noninvasive, and hygienic screening tool in discriminating DED and non-DED and potentially alleviating inconvenience experienced during conventional tests.
干眼疾病(DED)是一种多因素疾病,也是眼科门诊最常见的治疗问题之一。由于临床表现的多样性,DED的诊断需要主观和客观临床检查相结合。本研究的目的是评估基于智能手机的手持式红外热成像(IRT)相机筛查有症状的蒸发型DED的有效性。
这项观察性性别匹配对照研究评估了184名参与者184只右眼(46只正常眼和138只干眼)的IRT图像。使用无创泪膜破裂时间、荧光素染色和中文版眼表疾病指数(C-OSDI)问卷评估蒸发型DED,并将其分为各自的干眼症状组(无、轻度、中度或重度)。使用基于智能手机的手持式IRT相机测量并比较8个感兴趣的解剖区域(ROI)(鼻侧结膜、鼻侧角膜缘、鼻侧角膜、中央角膜、下方角膜、颞侧角膜缘、颞侧角膜和颞侧结膜)的眼表温度(OST)。根据与DED严重程度的相关性及其曲线下面积(AUC)评估这8个ROI的OST在检测不同严重程度DED方面的有效性。
除下方角膜、颞侧角膜缘和颞侧结膜区域外(>0.05),DED参与者8个解剖ROI的OST显著高于非DED组(<0.05)。对8个解剖ROI进行分析发现,鼻侧角膜缘与DED严重程度的Pearson相关性最高(0.64,<0.001)。此外,在比较鼻侧角膜缘ROI区分DED与非DED眼的能力时,其AUC最高,为0.79(CI:0.73 - 0.85;<0.05),敏感性和特异性分别为0.96和0.91。
基于智能手机的手持式IRT图像并非诊断工具,而是一种快速、无创且卫生的筛查工具,可用于区分DED和非DED,并可能减轻传统检查过程中的不便。