Strowd Roy E, Strauss Lauren, Graham Rachel, Dodenhoff Kristen, Schreiber Allysen, Thomson Sharon, Ambrosini Alexander, Thurman Annie Madeline, Olszewski Carly, Smith L Daniela, Cartwright Michael S, Guzik Amy, Wells Rebecca Erwin, Munger Clary Heidi, Malone John, Ezzeddine Mustapha, Duncan Pamela W, Tegeler Charles H
Wake Forest School of Medicine (RES, LS, KD, AS, ST, AA, AMT, CO, LDS, MSC, HMC, JM, ME, CT); and Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center (RG, AG, RW, PD), Winston-Salem, NC.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;11(3):232-241. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000906.
To describe rapid implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess for disparities in video visit implementation in the Appalachian region of the United States.
A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients seen in the first 4 weeks of telehealth implementation was identified from the Neurology Ambulatory Practice at a large academic medical center. Telehealth visits defaulted to video, and when unable, phone-only visits were scheduled. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the telehealth visit type: video or phone only. Clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record including age, sex, race, insurance status, indication for visit, and rural-urban status. Barriers to scheduling video visits were collected at the time of scheduling. Patient satisfaction was obtained by structured postvisit telephone call.
Of 1,011 telehealth patient visits, 44% were video and 56% phone only. Patients who completed a video visit were younger (39.7 vs 48.4 years, < 0.001), more likely to be female (63% vs 55%, < 0.007), be White or Caucasian ( = 0.024), and not have Medicare or Medicaid insurance ( < 0.001). The most common barrier to scheduling video visits was technology limitations (46%). Although patients from rural and urban communities were equally likely to be scheduled for video visits, patients from rural communities were more likely to consider future telehealth visits (55% vs 42%, = 0.05).
Rapid implementation of ambulatory telemedicine defaulting to video visits successfully expanded video telehealth. Emerging disparities were revealed, as older, male, Black patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were less likely to complete video visits.
描述在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗的快速实施情况,并评估美国阿巴拉契亚地区视频问诊实施过程中的差异。
从一家大型学术医疗中心的神经科门诊实践中确定了在远程医疗实施的前4周内连续就诊的患者组成的回顾性队列。远程医疗问诊默认采用视频方式,若无法进行视频问诊,则安排仅通过电话的问诊。根据远程医疗问诊类型将患者分为两组:视频问诊组或仅电话问诊组。从电子病历中收集临床变量,包括年龄、性别、种族、保险状况、就诊指征和城乡状况。在安排视频问诊时收集安排视频问诊的障碍因素。通过结构化的问诊后电话回访获得患者满意度。
在1011次远程医疗患者问诊中,44%为视频问诊,56%仅为电话问诊。完成视频问诊的患者更年轻(39.7岁对48.4岁,P<0.001),更可能为女性(63%对55%,P<0.007),为白人或高加索人(P=0.024),且没有医疗保险或医疗补助保险(P<0.001)。安排视频问诊最常见的障碍是技术限制(46%)。尽管农村和城市社区的患者被安排进行视频问诊的可能性相同,但农村社区的患者更有可能考虑未来的远程医疗问诊(55%对42%,P=0.05)。
默认采用视频问诊的门诊远程医疗的快速实施成功扩大了视频远程医疗的应用。研究揭示了新出现的差异,即年龄较大、男性、有医疗保险或医疗补助保险的黑人患者完成视频问诊的可能性较小。