Suppr超能文献

临床指南中的维生素 D 推荐:系统评价、质量评估和潜在预测因素分析。

Vitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors.

机构信息

Health Centre Dr Mendiguchia Carriche, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Leganes, Madrid, Spain.

Primary Care, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14805. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14805. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D has been widely promoted for bone health through supplementation and fortification of the general adult population. However, there is growing evidence that does not support these strategies. Our aim is to review the quality and recommendations on vitamin D nutritional and clinical practice guidelines and to explore predictive factors for their direction and strength.

METHODS

We searched three databases and two guideline repositories from 2010 onwards. We performed a descriptive analysis, a quality appraisal using AGREE II scores (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) and a bivariate analysis evaluating the association between direction and strength of recommendations, AGREE II domains' scores and pre-specified characteristics.

RESULTS

We included 34 guidelines, 44.1% recommended, 26.5% suggested and 29.4% did not recommend vitamin D supplementation. Guidelines that scored higher for "editorial independence" and "overall quality score" were less likely to recommend or suggest vitamin D supplementation (median 68.8 vs 35.4; P = .001 and 58.3 vs 37.5; P = .02). Guidance produced by government organisations and those that reported source of funding were associated with higher AGREE II scores. Unclear role of source of funding was associated with recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (P = .034). Editorial independence was an independent predictor for recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (OR 1.09; CI95% 1.02 to 1.16; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers, clinicians and patients should be aware that lower quality guidelines and those reporting conflicts of interest are more likely to promote vitamin D supplementation. Guideline organisations should improve the quality of their recommendations' development and the management of conflicts of interest. Users and editors should be aware of these findings when using and appraising guidelines.

摘要

背景

维生素 D 通过补充和强化一般成年人的饮食已被广泛推广以促进骨骼健康。然而,越来越多的证据并不支持这些策略。我们旨在审查维生素 D 营养和临床实践指南的质量和建议,并探讨其方向和强度的预测因素。

方法

我们从 2010 年起在三个数据库和两个指南库中进行了搜索。我们进行了描述性分析,使用 AGREE II 评分(评估研究和评价指南)进行质量评估,并进行了双变量分析,以评估建议的方向和强度、AGREE II 领域评分和预定特征之间的关联。

结果

我们纳入了 34 项指南,其中 44.1%推荐、26.5%建议、29.4%不推荐维生素 D 补充。在“编辑独立性”和“整体质量评分”方面得分较高的指南不太可能推荐或建议补充维生素 D(中位数 68.8 对 35.4;P=0.001 和 58.3 对 37.5;P=0.02)。政府组织制定的指南和报告资金来源的指南与较高的 AGREE II 评分相关。资金来源的作用不明确与推荐或建议补充维生素 D 相关(P=0.034)。编辑独立性是推荐或建议补充维生素 D 的独立预测因素(OR 1.09;95%CI 1.02 至 1.16;P=0.006)。

结论

决策者、临床医生和患者应该意识到,质量较低和报告利益冲突的指南更有可能促进维生素 D 补充。指南制定组织应提高其建议制定的质量并管理利益冲突。用户和编辑在使用和评估指南时应注意这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验