• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致重度哮喘患者生物疗法停药的因素。

Factors leading to discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with severe asthma.

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2022 Sep;59(9):1839-1849. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1971700. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2021.1971700
PMID:34486912
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient- and physician-reported reasons for discontinuing biologic therapy among patients with severe asthma from a real-world US cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis surveyed US physicians and their patients with severe asthma who were receiving/had previously received biologic therapy between August and December 2019. Physicians managing ≥3 patients with asthma per month completed surveys on disease management, demographics, exacerbation history, and biologic adherence for eligible patients. Patients could voluntarily complete a questionnaire, providing perceptions of their disease and treatment.

RESULTS

117 physicians completed case reports for 285 patients; 85 patients had discontinued biologic therapy. Physicians ( = 85) and patients ( = 64) reported patient request (28.2% and 46.9%), shortness of breath (45.9% and 23.4%), other chronic respiratory symptoms (29.4% and 10.9%), cost/reimbursement (17.7%/9.4% and 20.3%/7.8%), and exacerbations (25.9% and 10.9%) among the main reasons for biologic discontinuation. Patients who continued biologic therapy were older (mean age 47.6 years) than those who discontinued (43.8 years), and were more likely to have ≥2 exacerbations in the previous year (52.5% vs 35.3%), allergic rhinitis (70.0% vs 62.4%), or chronic rhinosinusitis (30.0% vs 12.9%). Side effects were cited as reasons by only 15.3% and 7.8% of physicians and patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common reasons given for discontinuation of biologic therapy were lack of symptom control, exacerbations, cost, and patient request. These data highlight the complexity of care for this patient group and the need for ongoing, regular assessment of common challenges to biologic continuation and reasons for discontinuation, including both clinical and non-clinical factors.

摘要

目的

评估来自美国真实世界队列的重度哮喘患者停止使用生物制剂治疗的患者和医生报告的原因。

方法

这项回顾性分析调查了美国医生及其 2019 年 8 月至 12 月期间正在接受/之前曾接受过生物制剂治疗的重度哮喘患者。每月管理≥3 名哮喘患者的医生为符合条件的患者完成了关于疾病管理、人口统计学、加重史和生物制剂依从性的调查。患者可以自愿填写问卷,提供对其疾病和治疗的看法。

结果

117 名医生为 285 名患者完成了病例报告;85 名患者已停止使用生物制剂。医生(85 人)和患者(64 人)报告的主要停药原因包括患者要求(28.2%和 46.9%)、呼吸急促(45.9%和 23.4%)、其他慢性呼吸道症状(29.4%和 10.9%)、费用/报销(17.7%/9.4%和 20.3%/7.8%)和加重(25.9%和 10.9%)。继续使用生物制剂的患者年龄较大(平均年龄 47.6 岁),而停止使用的患者年龄较小(43.8 岁),且过去一年中更有可能出现≥2 次加重(52.5%比 35.3%)、过敏性鼻炎(70.0%比 62.4%)或慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(30.0%比 12.9%)。只有 15.3%的医生和 7.8%的患者将副作用作为停药原因。

结论

停止生物制剂治疗的最常见原因是缺乏症状控制、加重、费用和患者要求。这些数据突出了该患者群体护理的复杂性,需要持续定期评估生物制剂继续治疗和停药的常见挑战及原因,包括临床和非临床因素。

相似文献

1
Factors leading to discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with severe asthma.导致重度哮喘患者生物疗法停药的因素。
J Asthma. 2022 Sep;59(9):1839-1849. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1971700. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
2
Clinical and economic burden of severe asthma among US patients treated with biologic therapies.美国接受生物疗法治疗的重度哮喘患者的临床和经济负担。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Sep;127(3):318-325.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Real-World Effectiveness of Reslizumab in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma - First Initiators and Switchers.重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者瑞利珠单抗的真实世界疗效 - 初治患者和转换治疗患者。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Aug;10(8):2099-2108.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Exploring Perceptions of Biologic Therapies: A Qualitative Study Among Canadians Living with Severe Asthma.探索生物疗法的认知:加拿大严重哮喘患者定性研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1401-1418. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02803-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Efficacy, Safety, and Continuation of Biological Therapy in Older Patients with Asthma in a Real-World Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study.真实世界中老年哮喘患者生物治疗的疗效、安全性及持续性:一项回顾性观察研究
Yonago Acta Med. 2024 Apr 22;67(2):114-123. doi: 10.33160/yam.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Severe asthma exacerbations in the United States:: Incidence, characteristics, predictors, and effects of biologic treatments.美国严重哮喘恶化情况:发生率、特征、预测因素和生物治疗的效果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):579-587.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Benralizumab Effectiveness in Severe Asthma Is Independent of Previous Biologic Use.本那鲁单抗治疗重症哮喘的疗效与之前使用生物制剂无关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jun;10(6):1534-1544.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Asthma biologics: Real-world effectiveness, impact of switching biologics, and predictors of response.哮喘生物制剂:真实世界的疗效、生物制剂转换的影响以及反应的预测因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Dec;127(6):655-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.08.416. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
Asthma patients' and physicians' perspectives on the burden and management of asthma.哮喘患者和医生对哮喘负担和管理的看法。
Respir Med. 2021 Sep;186:106524. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106524. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of severe asthma patients with a history of multiple biologic drugs use.多生物制剂治疗史的重度哮喘患者的临床特征和治疗结局。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2023 Jun;41(2):106-112. doi: 10.12932/AP-170221-1070.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Biologic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Survey of Canadians with Severe Asthma.生物治疗的偏好:一项针对加拿大重度哮喘患者的离散选择实验调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 22;19:1509-1522. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S512755. eCollection 2025.
2
Challenges and Opportunities in Achieving Asthma Remission.实现哮喘缓解的挑战与机遇
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 20;14(8):2835. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082835.
3
Efficacy of omalizumab after discontinuation: a retrospective single-center observational study in children with severe asthma.
停用奥马珠单抗后的疗效:一项针对重度哮喘儿童的回顾性单中心观察性研究。
Front Allergy. 2025 Mar 7;6:1529624. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1529624. eCollection 2025.
4
Treatment patterns and factors associated with discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies.单克隆抗体的治疗模式及与停药相关的因素。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 19;12:20503121241271817. doi: 10.1177/20503121241271817. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring Perceptions of Biologic Therapies: A Qualitative Study Among Canadians Living with Severe Asthma.探索生物疗法的认知:加拿大严重哮喘患者定性研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1401-1418. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02803-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Comparative short-term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta-analysis.内镜鼻窦手术与生物疗法治疗鼻息肉慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的短期疗效比较:网状Meta分析
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Jun;13(6):e12269. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12269.
7
Switching from one biologic to benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: An ANANKE study analysis.重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者从一种生物制剂转换为贝那利珠单抗治疗:ANANKE研究分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 2;9:950883. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950883. eCollection 2022.
8
Specific Therapy for T2 Asthma.T2 哮喘的特异性治疗
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):593. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040593.