Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Insubria, Varese.
Acta Biomed. 2021 Sep 2;92(4):e2021219. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.11433.
The purpose of the study was to compare the data obtained by two independent observers and statistically analyze the results using Cohen's K to highlight the concordance or discordance in the diagnosis of normality, pathology and, in particular, the type of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) on plain films.
the study was conducted retrospectively. The only inclusion criterium was the minimum age of 20 years. All patients underwent a radiographic examination of the pelvis in standard anteroposterior projection in orthostasis.
A good concordance between the two operators in the examination of normal hip joint (k= 0.68 right/ 0,74 left) was found; a similar grade of agreement was found for the analysis of "pincer" type FAI (k = 0.73 right, 0,67 left). The best results in concordance were achieved in the examination of "cam" type FAI (k= 0.82 right, 0,88 left), "mixed" type FAI (k = 0.85 right, 0,86 left), and in findings of "coxa profunda" (k = 0.92 right, 0,88 left).
We found a good concordance between the two readers; a few cases of disagreement were found in the diagnosis of "pincer" type FAI and absence of disease. This discrepancy may be due to the different weight given by the single observer to the clinical indication that leads the patient to examination, but also by the difficulty of a not dedicated radiologist to show some subtle signs indicative of early FAI.
本研究的目的是比较两名独立观察者获得的数据,并使用 Cohen's K 进行统计学分析,以突出在正常、病理诊断,特别是在平片上诊断股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)类型方面的一致性或不一致性。
本研究为回顾性研究。唯一的纳入标准是年龄至少 20 岁。所有患者均在直立位行骨盆标准前后位放射检查。
两名操作者在正常髋关节检查(右侧 k=0.68/左侧 k=0.74)中发现了较好的一致性;在“钳夹”型 FAI(右侧 k=0.73/左侧 k=0.67)分析中发现了类似的一致性。在“凸轮”型 FAI(右侧 k=0.82/左侧 k=0.88)、“混合型”FAI(右侧 k=0.85/左侧 k=0.86)和“髋深”(右侧 k=0.92/左侧 k=0.88)检查中,一致性最好。
我们发现两名读者之间有较好的一致性;在“钳夹”型 FAI 和无疾病的诊断中发现了少数不一致的情况。这种差异可能是由于单个观察者对导致患者进行检查的临床指征的重视程度不同,也可能是因为非专业放射科医生难以显示出一些提示早期 FAI 的细微征象。