Diesel C V, Ribeiro T A, Coussirat C, Scheidt R B, Macedo C A S, Galia C R
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Ramiro Barcelos Street 2400, CEP:90035-003, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Roraima Avenue 1000, CEP:97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Bone Joint J. 2015 Apr;97-B(4):478-83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.34577.
In many papers, the diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is attributed to the presence of coxa profunda. However, little is known about the prevalence of coxa profunda in the general population and its clinical relevance. In order to ascertain its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects and whether it is a reliable indicator of pincer-type FAI, we undertook a cross-sectional study between July and December 2013. A total of 226 subjects (452 hips) were initially screened. According to strict inclusion criteria, 129 asymptomatic patients (257 hips) were included in the study. The coxa profunda sign, the crossover sign, the acetabular index (AI) and lateral centre-edge (LCE) angle were measured on the radiographs. The median age of the patients was 36.5 years (28 to 50) and 138 (53.7%) were women. Coxa profunda was present in 199 hips (77.4%). There was a significantly increased prevalence of coxa profunda in women (p < 0.05) and a significant association between coxa profunda and female gender (p < 0.001) (92% vs 60.5%). The crossover sign was seen in 36 hips (14%), an LCE > 40° in 28 hips (10.9%) and an AI < 0º in 79 hips (30.7%). A total of 221 normal hips (79.2%) (normal considering the crossover) had coxa profunda, a total of 229 normal hips (75.5%) (normal considering the LCE) had coxa profunda and a total of 178 normal hips (75.3%) (normal considering AI) had coxa profunda. When the presence of all radiological signs in the same subject was considered, pincer-type FAI was found in only two hips (one subject). We therefore consider that the coxa profunda sign should not be used as a radiological indicator of pincer-type FAI. We consider profunda to be a benign alteration in the morphology of the hip with low prevalence and a lack of association with other radiological markers of FAI. We suggest that the diagnosis of pincer-type FAI should be based on objective measures, in association with clinical findings.
在许多论文中,钳夹型股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)的诊断归因于髋臼过深。然而,对于髋臼过深在普通人群中的患病率及其临床相关性知之甚少。为了确定其在无症状受试者中的患病率以及它是否是钳夹型FAI的可靠指标,我们在2013年7月至12月期间进行了一项横断面研究。最初共筛查了226名受试者(452个髋关节)。根据严格的纳入标准,129名无症状患者(257个髋关节)被纳入研究。在X线片上测量髋臼过深征、交叉征、髋臼指数(AI)和外侧中心边缘(LCE)角。患者的中位年龄为36.5岁(28至50岁),其中138名(53.7%)为女性。199个髋关节(77.4%)存在髋臼过深。女性髋臼过深的患病率显著增加(p < 0.05),且髋臼过深与女性性别之间存在显著关联(p < 0.001)(92%对60.5%)。36个髋关节(14%)出现交叉征,28个髋关节(10.9%)LCE>40°,79个髋关节(30.7%)AI<0°。共有221个正常髋关节(79.2%)(考虑交叉征为正常)存在髋臼过深,共有229个正常髋关节(75.5%)(考虑LCE为正常)存在髋臼过深,共有178个正常髋关节(75.3%)(考虑AI为正常)存在髋臼过深。当考虑同一受试者所有放射学征象的存在时,仅在两个髋关节(一名受试者)中发现钳夹型FAI。因此,我们认为髋臼过深征不应作为钳夹型FAI的放射学指标。我们认为髋臼过深是髋关节形态的一种良性改变,患病率低,且与FAI的其他放射学标志物无关。我们建议钳夹型FAI的诊断应基于客观测量,并结合临床发现。