• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创右半肝切除术在活体供肝中的应用:荟萃分析。

The impact of mini-invasive right hepatectomy in the setting of living donation: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):23-34. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01160-x. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-021-01160-x
PMID:34487336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8827159/
Abstract

Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (A2ALDLT) represents a challenging procedure, mainly when the right hepatic lobe is donated. Therefore, especially in Western countries, the medical community still considers it a "risky procedure". The present meta-analysis investigated the postoperative results reported in donors undergoing right hepatectomy for A2ALDLT through a minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) vs. open liver resection (OLR) approach, with the intent to clarify the hypothesis that the MILR approach should minimize the risks for the donor. A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE electronic databases. The primary outcome investigated was the complication rate after transplant. Fifteen studies were included (n = 2094; MILR = 553 vs. OLR = 1541). The MILR group only merged the statistical relevance in terms of advantage in terms of a lower number of complications (OR = 0.771, 95% CI 0.578-1.028; P value = 0.077). Investigating the complications ≥ IIIa according to the Dindo-Clavien classification, the estimated blood loss, and the length of hospital stay, no statistical difference was reported between the two groups. MILR represents a novel and promising approach for improving the results in A2ALDLT. However, no benefits have been reported regarding blood loss, length of stay, and postoperative complications. More extensive experiences are needed to re-evaluate the impact of MILR in right lobe live donation.

摘要

成人对成人活体肝移植(A2ALDLT)是一项具有挑战性的手术,尤其是当右肝叶被捐献时。因此,特别是在西方国家,医学界仍认为这是一种“有风险的手术”。本荟萃分析通过微创肝切除术(MILR)与开腹肝切除术(OLR)比较,研究了接受 A2ALDLT 的右肝叶切除术供体的术后结果,旨在澄清 MILR 方法应最小化供体风险的假设。使用 MEDLINE-PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 电子数据库进行了系统的文献检索。主要研究结果是移植后的并发症发生率。共纳入 15 项研究(n=2094;MILR=553 例,OLR=1541 例)。MILR 组仅在并发症数量较少的优势方面具有统计学相关性(OR=0.771,95%CI 0.578-1.028;P 值=0.077)。根据 Dindo-Clavien 分类,研究并发症≥IIIa 级、估计出血量和住院时间,两组间无统计学差异。MILR 代表一种新颖而有前途的方法,可以改善 A2ALDLT 的结果。然而,在出血量、住院时间和术后并发症方面,并没有报道有任何益处。需要更多的经验来重新评估 MILR 在右叶活体供肝中的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/f29b70fa89ed/13304_2021_1160_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/c5372d4466fc/13304_2021_1160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/8c6c08befb1b/13304_2021_1160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/9105602fd28d/13304_2021_1160_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/be4261a11027/13304_2021_1160_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/f29b70fa89ed/13304_2021_1160_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/c5372d4466fc/13304_2021_1160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/8c6c08befb1b/13304_2021_1160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/9105602fd28d/13304_2021_1160_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/be4261a11027/13304_2021_1160_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/642c/8827159/f29b70fa89ed/13304_2021_1160_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of mini-invasive right hepatectomy in the setting of living donation: a meta-analysis.微创右半肝切除术在活体供肝中的应用:荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):23-34. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01160-x. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
2
Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis.微创与开放右前叶切除术及中央肝切除术治疗中央型肝脏恶性肿瘤:一项倾向评分匹配分析
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):E174-E182. doi: 10.1111/ans.16719. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more.单机构300例微创肝切除术的评估:少即是多。
Ann Surg. 2007 Sep;246(3):385-92; discussion 392-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c.
4
Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An International, Multi-institutional Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy and Early Outcomes.微创供肝切除术在成人活体肝移植中的应用:一项国际多机构安全性、有效性和早期结果的评估。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):166-174. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003852.
5
Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis.微创与开腹原发性肝癌肝切除术近期与远期疗效比较:1:1 匹配分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):560-571. doi: 10.1002/jso.26556. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after open hepatectomy compared to minimally invasive liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹肝切除术后与微创肝切除术后静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Aug;25(8):872-880. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
7
Impact of liver cirrhosis on the difficulty of minimally-invasive liver resections: a 1:1 coarsened exact-matched controlled study.肝硬化对微创肝切除术难度的影响:1:1 粗糙精确匹配对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5231-5238. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Minimally invasive versus open living donors right hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放活体右半肝切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106152. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析比较开放式、腹腔镜辅助式、纯腹腔镜式和机器人辅助活体供肝切除术。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Oct 1;29(10):1063-1078. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000115. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Robotic and laparoscopic right lobe living donation compared to the open approach: A multicenter study on 1194 donor hepatectomies.机器人和腹腔镜右半肝活体供肝切除术与开放手术的比较:一项关于 1194 例供肝切除术的多中心研究。
Liver Transpl. 2024 May 1;30(5):484-492. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000304. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Metformin and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.二甲双胍与胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 21;30(7):759-769. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i7.759.
2
Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation.亚太肝病学会肝脏移植临床实践指南。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Apr;18(2):299-383. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Minimally Invasive Donors Right Hepatectomy versus Open Donors Right Hepatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation From Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative From the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA).微创供肝切取用于活体肝移植的专家共识指南:从创新到实施:国际腹腔镜肝脏学会(ILLS)和亚太肝脏病学、胆胰学和肝脏移植学会(A-PHPBA)的联合倡议。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):96-108. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004475.
2
Robotic Versus Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与开放性右半肝供肝切取术在成人活体肝移植中的应用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Nov;26(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.1002/lt.25820. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
微创供体右半肝切除术与开放供体右半肝切除术:一项Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 17;12(8):2904. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082904.
Safe Strategy to Initiate Total Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Stepwise Approach From a Laparoscopy-Assisted Method.安全启动全腹腔镜供体右半肝切除术的策略:一种从腹腔镜辅助方法逐步进行的方法。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3108-3118. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05572-5.
4
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis.在荟萃分析中根据常见报告的分位数估计样本均值和标准差。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2520-2537. doi: 10.1177/0962280219889080. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between pure laparoscopic surgery and open right hepatectomy in living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.活体肝移植中单纯腹腔镜手术与开腹右半肝切除术围手术期结局的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62289-0.
6
Learning curve of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy.腹腔镜活体供肝右叶切除术的学习曲线。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):278-288. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11350. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
7
Comparison of pure laparoscopic and open living donor right hepatectomy after a learning curve.学习曲线后纯腹腔镜与开放活体供体右半肝切除术的比较
Clin Transplant. 2019 Oct;33(10):e13683. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13683. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Long-term Follow-up of Laparoscope-Assisted Living Donor Hepatectomy.腹腔镜辅助活体供肝肝切除术的长期随访
Transplant Proc. 2018 Nov;50(9):2597-2600. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Open Hepatectomy for Live Liver Donor: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开腹肝切除术用于活体肝供者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2017:2956749. doi: 10.1155/2017/2956749. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
10
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.