Zhang Lu, Du Dan, Wang Lian, Guo Linghong, Jiang Xian
Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Laboratory of Dermatology, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology (CIII), Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Dermatol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1877-1883. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16126. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
Topical Janus kinase (JAK) and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for atopic dermatitis (AD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors for AD treatment. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2021 for eligible studies of AD patients treated with topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors. Baseline and follow-up data were extracted. Efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) achieving "clear" or "almost clear", with 2 points or more improvement from baseline at the end of treatment, referred to as "IGA response"). A Bayesian multiple treatment network meta-analysis with fixed effects was performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility interval (CrI) were used for comparing the efficacy of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with placebo for AD. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials of topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with 4689 patients were included for analysis. A total of three topical JAK inhibitors and two topical PDE4 inhibitors were included. Compared with placebo, all JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had higher IGA response at 4 weeks of treatment. Notably, with similar safety profile, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d., and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed favorable IGA response compared with topical tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Ranking analysis suggested that among all included JAK and PDE4 inhibitors, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d. had the highest probability of achieving IGA response (SUCRA = 0.880). Besides, JAK and PDE4 inhibitors showed non-inferior safety profile with placebo. This study confirmed that topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy and safety for AD patients. Tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d. and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed superior efficacy over other JAK and PDE4 inhibitors.
外用 Janus 激酶(JAK)和磷酸二酯酶 -4(PDE4)抑制剂是特应性皮炎(AD)的新型治疗方法。本研究旨在比较 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂治疗 AD 的疗效和安全性。检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,直至 2021 年 6 月,以查找外用 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂治疗 AD 患者的符合条件的研究。提取了基线和随访数据。使用研究者整体评估(IGA)评估 JAK 抑制剂的疗效,达到“清除”或“几乎清除”,治疗结束时较基线改善 2 分或更多,称为“IGA 反应”)。进行了固定效应的贝叶斯多重治疗网络荟萃分析。使用具有 95% 可信度区间(CrI)的优势比(OR)来比较 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂与安慰剂治疗 AD 的疗效。总共纳入了 10 项外用 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂的随机对照试验,共 4689 名患者进行分析。总共包括三种外用 JAK 抑制剂和两种外用 PDE4 抑制剂。与安慰剂相比,所有 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂在治疗 4 周时的 IGA 反应更高。值得注意的是,在安全性相似的情况下,2% 每日两次的托法替布、1.5% 每日两次的鲁索替尼和 3% 每日两次的地尔戈替尼与外用他克莫司和皮质类固醇相比,显示出良好的 IGA 反应。排名分析表明,在所有纳入的 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂中,2% 每日两次的托法替布实现 IGA 反应的概率最高(累积排序曲线下面积 [SUCRA] = 0.880)。此外,JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂与安慰剂相比显示出非劣效的安全性。本研究证实,外用 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂对 AD 患者具有有前景的治疗疗效和安全性。2% 每日两次的托法替布、1.5% 每日两次的鲁索替尼和 3% 每日两次的地尔戈替尼显示出优于其他 JAK 和 PDE4 抑制剂的疗效。