Service of General Psychiatry, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Service of General Psychiatry, Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Nov;143:123-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.023. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
While first-episode schizophrenia has received extensive attention in the literature, few studies have focused on the first episode of affective psychoses. Considering the lack of structured data regarding this diagnostic grouping commonly used in clinical settings, our aim was to scope the literature on first-episode affective psychoses to consolidate current knowledge and to identify areas to be targeted in future studies. We also planned to investigate the relevance of the "affective psychosis" concept regarding diagnostic categories and specific needs of intervention. We conducted a search on the Embase, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web Of Science databases until October 2020. We selected studies and synthesized the key findings into a narrative review regarding major topics of early intervention research: diagnostic categorization, premorbid factors, intervention, duration of untreated illness, neurobiology and neurocognition. After screening 961 titles and abstracts and 193 full-text papers, we selected 77 studies for inclusion. Our results showed heterogeneity in diagnosis-related grouping under the concept of affective psychoses, especially variability regarding the inclusion of schizoaffective disorder. Nonetheless, this concept still encompasses patients with different psychopathological and neurocognitive profiles from the non-affective patients requiring specialized intervention. This study thus provided support for the relevance of this concept as well as a need for further investigation.
虽然首次发作的精神分裂症在文献中受到广泛关注,但很少有研究关注情感性精神病的首次发作。考虑到针对这一在临床环境中常用的诊断分组缺乏结构化数据,我们旨在对首次发作的情感性精神病文献进行范围界定,以整合现有知识,并确定未来研究的重点领域。我们还计划研究“情感性精神病”概念在诊断类别和干预具体需求方面的相关性。我们在 Embase、Medline、PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Web Of Science 数据库中进行了检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 10 月。我们对主要早期干预研究主题的研究进行了筛选,并将关键发现综合为一篇叙述性综述:诊断分类、前驱因素、干预、未治疗疾病持续时间、神经生物学和神经认知。在筛选了 961 个标题和摘要以及 193 篇全文文章后,我们选择了 77 项研究进行纳入。我们的研究结果表明,在情感性精神病的概念下,与诊断相关的分组存在异质性,尤其是在纳入分裂情感障碍方面存在很大差异。尽管如此,这一概念仍包含具有不同精神病理学和神经认知特征的患者,需要专门干预。因此,这项研究支持了这一概念的相关性,同时也需要进一步研究。