• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的脑 CT 血管造影中团注追踪图像的 Hounsfield 单位值测量方法。

Deep learning-based Hounsfield unit value measurement method for bolus tracking images in cerebral computed tomography angiography.

机构信息

Division of Positron Emission Tomography, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan; Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.

Radiology Center, Kindai University Hospital, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2021 Oct;137:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104824. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104824
PMID:34488029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient movement during bolus tracking (BT) impairs the accuracy of Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements. This study assesses the accuracy of measuring HU values in the internal carotid artery (ICA) using an original deep learning (DL)-based method as compared with using the conventional region of interest (ROI) setting method.

METHOD

A total of 722 BT images of 127 patients who underwent cerebral computed tomography angiography were selected retrospectively and divided into groups for training data, validation data, and test data. To segment the ICA using our proposed method, DL was performed using a convolutional neural network. The HU values in the ICA were obtained using our DL-based method and the ROI setting method. The ROI setting was performed with and without correcting for patient body movement (corrected ROI and settled ROI). We compared the proposed DL-based method with settled ROI to evaluate HU value differences from the corrected ROI, based on whether or not patients experienced involuntary movement during BT image acquisition.

RESULTS

Differences in HU values from the corrected ROI in the settled ROI and the proposed method were 23.8 ± 12.7 HU and 9.0 ± 6.4 HU in patients with body movement and 1.1 ± 1.6 HU and 3.9 ± 4.7 HU in patients without body movement, respectively. There were significant differences in both comparisons (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DL-based method can improve the accuracy of HU value measurements for ICA in BT images with patient involuntary movement.

摘要

背景

在团注追踪(BT)期间,患者运动可损害亨氏单位(HU)测量的准确性。本研究评估了使用原始基于深度学习(DL)的方法与使用传统的感兴趣区域(ROI)设置方法相比,在颈内动脉(ICA)中测量 HU 值的准确性。

方法

回顾性选择了 127 名接受脑 CT 血管造影检查的患者的 722 个 BT 图像,并将其分为训练数据、验证数据和测试数据组。为了使用我们提出的方法分割 ICA,使用卷积神经网络进行了 DL。使用我们的基于 DL 的方法和 ROI 设置方法获得 ICA 中的 HU 值。在没有(校正 ROI)和有( settled ROI)校正患者身体运动的情况下进行 ROI 设置。我们比较了基于 DL 的方法与 settled ROI,以评估基于 BT 图像采集期间患者是否经历不自主运动,HU 值与校正 ROI 的差异。

结果

在有身体运动的患者中, settled ROI 和提议方法中与校正 ROI 的 HU 值差异分别为 23.8±12.7 HU 和 9.0±6.4 HU,在无身体运动的患者中,分别为 1.1±1.6 HU 和 3.9±4.7 HU。两种比较均有显著差异(P<0.01)。

结论

基于 DL 的方法可以提高有患者不自主运动的 BT 图像中 ICA 的 HU 值测量的准确性。

相似文献

1
Deep learning-based Hounsfield unit value measurement method for bolus tracking images in cerebral computed tomography angiography.基于深度学习的脑 CT 血管造影中团注追踪图像的 Hounsfield 单位值测量方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Oct;137:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104824. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique.16排螺旋CT冠状动脉造影术中静脉注射对比剂:试验性团注与团注追踪技术
Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):817-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333030668. Epub 2004 Oct 29.
3
Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging.使用 2D 和 3D 卷积神经网络从磁共振成像生成男性骨盆合成 CT 的深度学习方法。
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):3788-3798. doi: 10.1002/mp.13672. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
[Contrast-enhancement Effects of Dual-peak Contrast Medium Injection Method Using Bolus-tracking Technique in Coronary and Aorta CT Angiography].[团注追踪技术下双峰对比剂注射法在冠状动脉及主动脉CT血管造影中的对比增强效果]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2021;77(12):1424-1431. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2021_JSRT_77.12.1424.
5
[Comparison of Contrast Enhancement between Bolus-tracking and Test-bolus Methods on Coronary CT Angiography].[冠状动脉CT血管造影中团注追踪法与试验性团注法对比增强的比较]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2020;76(6):579-585. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.6.579.
6
The comparison of bolus tracking and test bolus techniques for computed tomography thoracic angiography in healthy beagles.健康比格犬胸部计算机断层血管造影中团注追踪与测试团注技术的比较。
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2013 May 7;84(1):E1-9. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v84i1.930.
7
Deep learning analysis in coronary computed tomographic angiography imaging for the assessment of patients with coronary artery stenosis.用于评估冠状动脉狭窄患者的冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影成像中的深度学习分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105651. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy.深度学习图像重建在冠状动脉 CT 血管造影中的验证:对噪声、图像质量和诊断准确性的影响。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT.基于深度学习和偏最小二乘回归的 CT 低对比度病灶检测任务模型观察器。
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2052-2063. doi: 10.1002/mp.13500. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning.头颈部癌放疗中基于CBCT的剂量计算方法比较:从亨氏单位到密度校准曲线再到深度学习
Med Phys. 2020 Oct;47(10):4683-4693. doi: 10.1002/mp.14387. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
PredMHC: An Effective Predictor of Major Histocompatibility Complex Using Mixed Features.PredMHC:一种使用混合特征的主要组织相容性复合体有效预测器。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 25;13:875112. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.875112. eCollection 2022.