GSK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01367-x.
Systematic and scoping literature searches are increasingly resource intensive. We present the results of a scoping review which combines the use of a novel artificial-intelligence-(AI)-assisted Medline search tool with two other 'traditional' literature search methods. We illustrate this novel approach with a case study to identify and map the range of conditions (clinical presentations, complications, coinfections and health problems) associated with gonorrhoea infection.
To fully characterize the range of health outcomes associated with gonorrhoea, we combined a high yield preliminary search with a traditional systematic search, then supplemented with the output of a novel AI-assisted Medline search tool based on natural language processing methods to identify eligible literature.
We identified 189 health conditions associated with gonorrhoea infection of which: 53 were identified through the initial 'high yield' search; 99 through the systematic search; and 124 through the AI-assisted search. These were extracted from 107 unique references and 21 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD 9/10) or Read codes. Health conditions were mapped to the urogenital tract (n = 86), anorectal tract (n = 6) oropharyngeal tract (n = 5) and the eye (n = 14); and other conditions such as systemic (n = 61) and neonatal conditions (n = 7), psychosocial associations (n = 3), and co-infections (n = 7). The 107 unique references attained a Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) score of ≥2++ (n = 2), 2+ (14 [13%]), 2- (30 [28%]) and 3 (45 [42%]), respectively. The remaining papers (n = 16) were reviews.
Through AI screening of Medline, we captured - titles, abstracts, case reports and case series related to rare but serious health conditions related to gonorrhoea infection. These outcomes might otherwise have been missed during a systematic search. The AI-assisted search provided a useful addition to traditional/manual literature searches especially when rapid results are required in an exploratory setting.
系统的和范围的文献检索越来越耗费资源。我们展示了一项范围综述的结果,该综述结合了一种新颖的人工智能(AI)辅助 Medline 搜索工具与另外两种“传统”文献搜索方法。我们通过一个案例研究来说明这种新方法,以确定和绘制与淋病感染相关的各种条件(临床表现、并发症、合并感染和健康问题)。
为了充分描述与淋病相关的健康结果范围,我们结合了一个高产量的初步搜索和一个传统的系统搜索,然后补充了一种基于自然语言处理方法的新颖的 AI 辅助 Medline 搜索工具的输出,以识别合格的文献。
我们确定了 189 种与淋病感染相关的健康状况,其中:53 种是通过初始的“高产量”搜索确定的;99 种是通过系统搜索确定的;124 种是通过 AI 辅助搜索确定的。这些都是从 107 个独特的参考文献和 21 个国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第九和第十次修订(ICD 9/10)或 Read 码中提取出来的。健康状况被映射到泌尿生殖系统(n=86)、肛门直肠系统(n=6)、口咽系统(n=5)和眼睛(n=14);以及其他条件,如全身(n=61)和新生儿条件(n=7)、心理社会关联(n=3)和合并感染(n=7)。107 个独特的参考文献获得了苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)得分≥2++(n=2)、2+(14[13%])、2-(30[28%])和 3(45[42%]),分别。其余的论文(n=16)是评论。
通过对 Medline 的 AI 筛选,我们捕获了与淋病感染相关的罕见但严重健康状况的标题、摘要、病例报告和病例系列。在系统搜索中,这些结果可能会被遗漏。AI 辅助搜索为传统/手动文献搜索提供了有用的补充,特别是在探索性设置中需要快速结果时。